| Game | Comments |
|---|---|
|
Feb. 09, 2008 Had pottential, didnt quite delivered tho. 2\5.
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 The concept itself is interesting, but the "game" as it is has no point whatsoever, so I dont understand why would someone bother uploading it. 2\5.
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 Had potential. Needs more lifes to make it less unforgiving. Needs more air time from start. Given the chance, people would pick similar older games, such as Motherload, instead.
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 These kind of games used to be very popular about 2\3 years ago, following a very rigid guideline of predictable results. With the implementation of more realistic phisics, I really have to say this attempt does not deserve more than I will give it now. 1\5.
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 Actually very entretaining. 4\5. Imho, it needs to be separated in levels, and lacks the hability to buy other powerups than the ones given in the game (upgrade craft speed, for instance).
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 Hands down, the worse game of its kind. Sadly, I cannot give it 0\5, but i'll give it 1\5. More than it deserves.
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 The "first and last name" policy is a little too posh and linear. Sorry, 2\5 cause of that one.
|
|
|
Feb. 11, 2008 Buggy. Overdone. 1\5.
|
|
|
Feb. 12, 2008 Poorly coded, but had potential. Doesnt deserver a badge imho, and not definatly a 15 point (medium). Good luck in your next attempts.
|
|
|
Feb. 13, 2008 Lunar Lander flashbacks here. Still, if you put a free play mode, i'm sure you'd have a lot more fans. 3\5
|
