Hey folks, the scoring issue with the S ranks is a bug, and oddly hard one to replicate here for me and the chap who did the rank screen programming for me. But I've just uploaded a new version with a tweak that we think is the source of the bug. I hope its gone now. You'll have to refresh you're browser window if you've been playing for a while. This comment made 9:45am GMT.
@ KrunkDaddy333 - I play tested that model for a LONG time, and in the end myself and a ton of others said it was pointless because unless you have balanced card base of a huge selection (at least 150 or more) it would only create an unbalanced game. People would end up choosing the same cards more or less, and it became too messy. There's 48 cards in the game, no need to a have a deck editor. Didn't bother with unlocking cards this time, just let people have them all at the start.
@Xonimmortal - 'Book of Dead Names' is far catchier! :)
@demersgh - In testing I found it tough to get an S rank (as it should be) - but once you get a few rounds in, you can replay older rounds. As you get more S ranks, you have higher stats, and so can play the earlier rounds with an advantange. Being a card game there will always be the element of luck of the draw.
Hey, do you like games? So do we — that’s what makes Kongregate the best source of free games online. We have thousands upon thousands of free online games, from both one-man indies and large studios, rated and filtered so you can play the best of the best. Read more »