| |
About me
- Member Since: Dec. 01, 2007
- Last Login: Dec. 13, 2011
- Current Points: 1848
- Comments: 28
- Forum posts: 13
- Location: Vienna, Austria
What is interesting is that how one first thinks of the problem has a great effect on one’s solution. It is pretty obvious that I looked at what I was trying to make on the Philosopher’s Stone and I saw the problem as two sides of 3 that needed to be connected by a connecting piece. You however saw that you had two feeders per side an… show moreWhat is interesting is that how one first thinks of the problem has a great effect on one’s solution. It is pretty obvious that I looked at what I was trying to make on the Philosopher’s Stone and I saw the problem as two sides of 3 that needed to be connected by a connecting piece. You however saw that you had two feeders per side and if they each contributed twice you would have 4 atoms which was 1/2 the needed result. Personally, after seeing yours (and some other people’s) I think your build a side of 4 and then change the atoms solution is more elegant and sensible. show less
Finally finished my Philosopher’s Stone (120/77). Interesting – I worked on a concept of building two sides then adding the connectors. You worked on concept of 4 doubles and then connecting them. Anyway, here it is:
b,3,11;c,1,9;b,10,11;c,13,9;b,1,7;b,7,7;b,6,9;b,12,5;m,4,13,270,1,lucdlll22oww;m,10,13,270,1,rucdrrr11oww;m,13,11,90,1… show moreFinally finished my Philosopher’s Stone (120/77). Interesting – I worked on a concept of building two sides then adding the connectors. You worked on concept of 4 doubles and then connecting them. Anyway, here it is:
b,3,11;c,1,9;b,10,11;c,13,9;b,1,7;b,7,7;b,6,9;b,12,5;m,4,13,270,1,lucdlll22oww;m,10,13,270,1,rucdrrr11oww;m,13,11,90,1,clllol;m,1,11,90,1,crrror;m,3,9,0,1,rc1llorwwwww;m,11,9,90,1,c2rrolwwwwwl;m,0,5,0,2,dowwuc;m,14,7,180,1,ouwwcd;m,1,4,90,2,rrwwwwwwcllo;m,13,3,90,1,llwwwwwwcrro;m,4,7,270,1,lcrrol;m,10,7,0,1,cllorr;m,8,5,90,1,1lluodrrwwc1; show less
I think your Elixir is all right, it’s slightly more efficient in terms of symbols than mine, but less in terms of cycles, probably because I managed to program my system with a chain of only 8 commands.
Here’s my horribly inefficient solution for the Philosopher’s Stone:
(I’m currently working on a complete redesign, after … show moreI think your Elixir is all right, it’s slightly more efficient in terms of symbols than mine, but less in terms of cycles, probably because I managed to program my system with a chain of only 8 commands.
Here’s my horribly inefficient solution for the Philosopher’s Stone:
(I’m currently working on a complete redesign, after a quite good idea I had for making it much more efficient.)
b,1,7;b,12,9;b,12,7;c,10,11;b,6,7;b,7,9;c,10,9;b,1,9;c,4,11;c,4,9;m,10,13,0,2,cdowwwwwwwu;m,4,13,180,2,cdowwwwwwwu;m,4,1,180,2,cdowwwwwwwu;m,13,11,270,1,rrcllowwwww;m,12,11,270,1,rrcllw2wuod;m,10,1,0,2,cdowwwwwwwu;m,13,4,90,2,llcrrowwwww;m,2,4,90,2,rrcllwlorww;m,1,4,90,2,rrcllowwwww;m,3,4,90,2,dlwwwwwcruo;m,2,11,270,1,llcrrowwwww;m,1,11,270,1,llcrrw2wuod;m,12,4,90,2,llcrrowwwww;m,10,7,0,1,r2rorrcuodc;m,4,7,180,1,ulodcl1ollc;m,7,5,0,1,rwwwclrwl2o;m,8,5,0,1,luuoddrwwwc; show less
Finally finished my Elixir. It’s nowhere near as nice as yours tho… (67/74)
b,3,11;b,10,11;b,1,8;c,7,6;b,10,6;c,12,8;m,13,11,90,1,crol;m,1,11,90,1,clor;m,6,11,180,2,douc;m,5,9,180,1,uodlcr;m,1,5,270,2,llluolwwwwcd;m,5,6,0,2,dlwwc22ruuod;m,8,11,0,2,douc;m,9,9,0,1,udorcl;m,11,3,90,3,wwjcddouuwcr2ol;
view all »
|
|
