It’s not really a circuit, but Western Ohio’s debate is my favorite.

I dislike TOC style, and I dislike where the national NFL circuit style is going. I’m not really aware of any other circuits; are there any? =P

Not really. Only been to a TOC tournament once, didn’t like it. Just joined this school year, though. Only really done PF, and I’m going to be doing LD this month. Which type do you prefer? I’m partial to PF because it’s policy based, although I try to do Novice CX whenever I can get the chance.

LD is my absolute favorite style, having done it for 3 years, and having quite a bit of success with it my last year. I just like the logical, analytical arguments you have to make, while still being clear and concise enough that a random parent judge can follow your points. It’s really interesting to teach and argue for a complex philosophical idea with a person that has probably never read any philosophy in their lives =P

Never was good with the whole philosophy thing. More for hard evidence. Got pounded in LD when I tried it. Really like PF- when the topics are right, anyway. Nice, hard facts to back up case with logic and quick, good speaking being the way to win. Although the topics in Texas sucked this year for PF. Two good topics was all I did.