Turagalover's messages

Attention, Warehooligans and others! The Warehouse is pleased to announce a new topical chat feature – The Recipe Exchange! The drooling will take place on Saturdays, 12:00 noon, U.S. Central Standard Time. The rules are simple; either find a recipe online or POST a favorite recipe online (I recommend recipezaar.com), share the title of the dish, along with the URL, and be prepared to discuss what you love about it.

NOTE: The Warehouse’s owner suggests that you have a snack handy to ward off hunger pangs this discussion may generate.

No. It’s entirely up to you to prove yourselves right…which you can’t do.

And you’ve contradicted yourself. We call you “narrow minded superstitious zealots” because of how narrow minded and superstitious you are. Of course, maybe if in the first place you’d agree that is IS your burden to provide proof, then we wouldn’t be saying that would we? Also the fact that some call you people that doesn’t have anything to do with who needs to provide the proof.

Those arguments you provide are just plain BS and if you have any brain at all you’ll see that… You could use those same desperate arguments to discount ANY evidence sciences provides.

There’s really a very large amount of evidence out there, so I’m just going to give you two of the more direct pieces of evidence.

-The rate and direction the universe is expanding in, if extrapolated back in time, shows all matter coming from the same point in space.

-Cosmic background radiation, which would have been released by the universe as it cooled and expanded, before being actually discovered, was predicted to exist by the Big Bang Theory; even the correct temperature was predicted.

As I said, there’s lots more out there if you care to look for it. And it’s not like it’s just unconnected, individual pieces of evidence; everything fits together and makes logical sense.

You’re mixing things up here. GOD can fit in with science, but CREATIONISM cannot. At all. There are massive amounts of evidence against creationism in practically every field of science. There are massive amounts of evidence against creationism in practically every field of science.

The need to provide proof is on the people who claim that god/creationism/etc. exists, not on others to prove them wrong.

Think of it this way: I could be talking to someone on the phone, and claim that there’s a magical dragon in my closet. Wouldn’t you agree that the burden is on ME to provide proof that is DOES exist, rather than on you to provide proof that it doesn’t?

I’ll provide some of the evidence for the big bang in a separate shout.

First off, where did you get the idea that I was talking about evolution? While I still hold the same opinion on that issue, what I was talking about on the forums was the Big Bang.

And how are they biased when they start out? Science class teaches…science. Plenty of them I’m sure went to church as well, yet still turned out as they are. Besides, if they were looking for proof to justify the existence of God, etc. they wouldn’t find anything concrete.

That is the reason why I don’t usually read blogs and take those information as the official version.

No matter how biased we might think the news media is, they are accountable for what they are reporting hence the accuracy is still far better overall.

I supposed it is no use for us to back and forth on the matter as each of us already made up our mind on the version of story that we considered as “truth”.