Enagamess' messages

I really tried…but I won’t play one of your games as long as I can see e.g. a part 7 of a series but can’t find its precedent parts (1 – 6) by any means, although having searched for them on your website. At LEAST make them easily(!) searchable by tags (series’ name plus part number) if you’re too lazy to provide a useful homepage with – inter alia – chronological linklists for your game series. If you upload series in future you want to name them sensible, e.g. “Serie’s name – part number – working/chapter title”. I am annoyed – because I actually was interested in “Reporter’s Murder Story” but up to now have invested nearly an hour of my precious(!) time for you – without having played a single minute. => Not a satisfying situation => Not quite a good experience to connect with your brand name for me, atm.

You have interesting ideas for the games, lots of stimulating puzzles in them, but at least half of them doesn’t work. Seriously, how hard it is to play your own game before launching it to make sure that the coding is running as it should? You can call the best as long as you like, but it would not make people play more that 1-2 games of your production if you teach people that if they come up on one of your works then better they left it alone because it is not worth their time.

You take time with coming up with both theme and puzzles for every day, creating the graphics. Why are you shooting yourself in the feet by not making sure that your games are working?

Instead of trying to make a slew of games as fast as possible, why not try and make better games? It’s all right if this means you would have to make fewer games, because the ones you make would be BETTER, right? Each of your “games” has only a couple hundred plays. You do understand that’s a BAD thing, right? If people aren’t playing your games, why not make games people like?