Which user submitted questions get added to the game and which don't seems completely arbitrary. I've submitted several questions that rate above 4.5 out of 5 and they don't qualify, so what's the point? I call shenanigans.
At first I was going to praise this game for making what I thought was the final level very difficult but beatable with some critical thinking. I thought grabbing that orange star thing was the end. But then it kept going. You made me go from frustrated, to relieved, to mad. Credit for making me feel a wide range of emotions. It's a shame most of those had to be bad. 2/5
Note to self: Don't play this when your computer is laggy and/or with a dying wireless mouse. Neither will be doing you any favors while playing this game.
If you send in a question and it doesn't qualify, it should be deleted from your list of submitted questions after about a week. I send lots of questions and most categories are getting cluttered.
Good concept, but it's too restrictive on where to click to get through the text boxes that pop up, and the placement of the puzzle pieces is too finicky. If it were more easily navigable, it's be a great game, but as it is, it's more frustrating than fun.
How well rated does a user submitted question have to be in order for it to be added to the game? I submitted a question that got a 4.63 rating and it didn't qualify, and that got a better rating than any other question I submitted. If that's not good enough, what's the point of submitting questions in the first place if it's going to be that strict?
Me being level 20, it's not fair to pair me up with people at levels of 100 or higher who answer perfectly in less than a second. The opponents you face should be people who are looking for games and are close to your level, not just whoever wants to play a game, regardless of how much higher their level is compared to yours.