LLCoolDave's Comments

Comment
Manufactoria	May. 21, 2010 Rating: -2 I think this is the optimal solution for politicans (sic), at least I can't find a better rearrangement of the pieces: ?lvl=22&code=g12:2f3;p12:5f3;c12:3f3;c12:6f3;c12:7f3;c12:8f3;c12:9f3;c12:10f3;c12:11f3;c12:12f3;i12:4f5;q13:2f1;r10:4f2;p11:4f1;p11:5f4;b11:6f1;p13:4f6;c14:4f1;c14:3f1;c14:2f0;b13:3f3;
Anti-Idle: The Game	Dec. 25, 2009 Rating: 0 Looks like the most recent update completely wrecked performance. Used to run at 50FPS on Best perfectly, now can barely reach 27 on low.
Polyominos	Sep. 01, 2009 Rating: 0 Concept is nice, but desperately needs color coding for different numbers so you can more easily tell groups apart visually.
Growth	Aug. 19, 2009 Rating: 0 Hit detection is pretty poor, you can move through most walls if you are quick enough.
MoneySeize	Jul. 05, 2009 Rating: 0 I think I was slightly faster in the 1010 coin quest than cirpacha and chase00, but congratulations nevertheless on finishing this game. I personally found level 38 to be the worst because you have to spend so much time just to try another way to tackle the middle section.
Advanced Ninja	Jun. 29, 2009 Rating: 0 That are the worst physics I've seen in a long time.
Light Them Up	Jun. 20, 2009 Rating: 0 Those have to be the most liberal interpretions of any sort of physics I have ever seen. You should really try to have SOME consistency in the way your objects behave.
Mate Master	Apr. 21, 2009 Rating: 0 It also fails completely at mating me. I just lasted well over 100 turns with a King against most of the black army doing random moves, hah.
Mate Master	Apr. 21, 2009 Rating: 0 The built in Chess engine is REALLY bad. I don't know much about the game AND played horrible and I still won. I started by moving all the pawns forward, then made a couple horrible trades and pretty much random not thought out moves. I ended up winning by promoting a pawn when the enemy king moved so that he was checkmate the moment I promoted my pawn. Pretty funny, but a fairly worthless feature.
Quest for Bacon	Mar. 08, 2009 Rating: 0 For whatever reason I really love the way the physics totally fail in this game.
Bible Fight	Mar. 07, 2009 Rating: 0 Somehow I don't see any depth in the gameplay. It appears to be a pretty bad button masher. No fun.
Globetrotter XL	Mar. 01, 2009 Rating: 0 Wow, two strikes in a row. That was unexpected.
Scriball	Jan. 14, 2009 Rating: 0 Just beat the extra levels and I have to admit this game was very challenging. Definitely deserves badges. It's annoying that you can't do anything to influence a ball going up, but if it wouldn't pass through the lines the game would be much too easy.
Dodge	Jan. 14, 2009 Rating: 0 The last level is totally insane, but immensly fun.
Scriball	Jan. 13, 2009 Rating: 0 Good Luck with the Bouncy ball is so horribly hard it's even beyond my tolerance for difficulty. That's easily the hardest video game task I've tackled in months. Can't imagine what super bouncy will be like.
Circle Pressure	Jan. 13, 2009 Rating: 0 The inertia just feels... wrong, somehow. It's hard to describe, buthe way it works is just, unintuitive.
Synapse	Jan. 12, 2009 Rating: 0 Somehow many of these are a lot easier than they should be if you just make a couple of small loops instead of connecting them all.
Andrew the Droid	Jan. 08, 2009 Rating: 0 You don't need the double jump for anything but activating the final chip, so I suggest maybe adding a secret message for everybody who finishes the game without it (obviously not requiring a double jump to finish it). I don't think the Clockwise turn can be skipped while completing the game, though.
Andrew the Droid	Jan. 08, 2009 Rating: 0 You can skip the second ability, what would happen if you finished the level without it?
Box Buncher	Nov. 15, 2008 Rating: 0 I've seldomly seen collission detection that strange.

« Prev
1
2
Next »