Quitis' messages

100% wrong again. Way to be yet another ignorant person. You need to break this down into every element and then determine wether each element is luck or not. If this were poker, then the first 10, 100, 1000 hands with the same group of people would be luck based. But after you gather data on betting habits, types of cards the other person likes to play, and other obvious factors, then you are no longer 100% luck. You finally have data to make educated guesses on. That is called a scientific hypothesis. You can now test your hypothesis, collect more data, and refine your guesses into theories. Those theories can then be further tested and eventually proven if t hey are correct at which point you now have fact. Once you finally have FACTS then you are no longer working with luck, you are working with hard evidence, absolute truth, and perfect strategy. Before you ever reach that point there is only, ONLY, a possibility, a chance, a LUCKY LUCKY LUCK LUCK LUCK occurance that you will get the desired result. This game is rock paper scissors at best, except that with rock paper scissors, I at least get to look my oponnent in the eye, study their hand movement and body language, and have at least an extra advantage if i’m good to guess correctly. But again, only after i’ve played rock paper scissors with the same person, a large number of times, will I ever have the EXPERIENCE necessary, to GUESS correctly a majority of the time.

But all that being said, IT IS STILL A GUESS. ANYTIME YOU ARE GUESSING YOU ARE RELYING UPON LUCK. LUCK, the basis for my entire argument, proven 100%, my points all made. Now go back to school and take an introductio to logic class, a probabilities and statistics class, and grow a brain.