doesn't work on IE? it's not a bug, it's a feature! you people don't need to rate it 1/5 for that... I assume that a fair rating is given when most of the game is tested. you only tested one feature (and a good one) so try to hold that anxiety for rating games for a bit. cheers
good first game. one thing I really liked to see was all the mystery about our own character. that keeps the player interested. if you can make a good plot out of it, it will surely be an awesome game series.
the gameplay is good, but not so challenging. it was a bit short too. try to balance those two (length and difficulty). I liked the type of interaction between the player and the scene. it was well done
the graphics were very good, and the dark environment is perfect for this type of game.
congrats! 5/5 (was going to give 4/5, but i'll give one more star for the potential of becoming a good game series)
A very complete point and click.
The graphics are awesome, the story is well built, the game play is great, cut scenes and environment are fantastic.
All I ask for... is a sequel. The mystery about the stoneheads can still be used to create a good storyline.
Congratulations, this is a great game indeed. 6/5
I think that the multiplayer could have some improvements. for example, each player could have a certain amount of money (equal to both) which would be used to buy units and upgrades as they liked. or at least the players could select the level of their civilization (the quantity of troops and the level of the upgrades) before the match. I'd really like to see the elite units on multiplayer battles.
another thing, already mentioned, is the fact that to win, we don't need a solid strategy. just by spamming troops, a player is able to win. You could add for example damage bonus multiplier of some troops to others (like cavalry damage to archers).
don't get me wrong. I enjoyed the game very much, and I'd really like to see a sequel, with some innovations.
regards
4/5
I agree with skeelo and thanon with their ideas and reviews. just a minor mistake, not important: the level 5 Baron on map is resistant to physical damage, yet it says it has resistance to fire damage. if it weren't for the wave browser, i wouldn't find it out
 "Rebuild"){kind=icon}
 "Being One"){kind=icon}
 "Old Difference"){kind=icon}
 "Morningstar"){kind=icon}
 "Electricman2HS"){kind=icon}
 "Warlords: Call to Arms"){kind=icon}
 "Kongai Launch"){kind=icon}
 "Protector"){kind=icon}
 "The Fancy Pants Adventure: World 2 demo"){kind=icon}