Fun fact everyone, you can beat this entire game without any grinding whatsoever. That means you can get bronze or gold in any and every stage without any absolute losses. This takes master strategies, though.
Apparently calling someone a 'foul dog scut' will get them to drop their weapons and retreat. I'm going to go try that in real life against an army, might as well try!
It seems to be a good game so far. The death scenes aren't very creative, but I know it's still in beta, so I forgive that. So far, after about 20 minutes of playing, I see that it is a pretty good game. Keep up the good work, I think it's a lot better than the first one so far! 3/5, will change when you update it.
It had a very nice concept, and excited me with the idea of building your own robots and fighting champions in battles. What saddened me? The thing that saddened me was the game itself. It had poor execution, barely any gameplay which is essential for an action game, and all in all, it had turns, etc... which should be used in a more RPG-like game, unfitting setting, going on and on is a possibility. This barely deserves a 2/5.
I'm not saying it's a bad game, but I won't say that it's a good game. It can barely even be recognized as having even a linear story. It's an adventure with only one quest and few dialogues, so it's not bound to be a great game. I'm not feeling generous, and I'm not feeling mean, so I'll give it a 2/5.
 "Fabrico"){kind=icon}
 "Epic War 4"){kind=icon}
 "Villainous"){kind=icon}
 "1066"){kind=icon}
 "Stick War 2"){kind=icon}
 "Rebuild 2"){kind=icon}
 "Dragon Fist 3D"){kind=icon}
 "Mutilate-a-Doll 2"){kind=icon}
 "Sands of the Coliseum"){kind=icon}
 "Caravaneer 2"){kind=icon}
 "AdVenture Capitalist"){kind=icon}
 "War Machines"){kind=icon}
 "William and Sly"){kind=icon}
 "Pandemic 2"){kind=icon}
 "atWar"){kind=icon}
 "The First Hero"){kind=icon}
 "House Idle PRO"){kind=icon}
 "Hungry Pumkin"){kind=icon}