ProjectX29: It's funny how vehemently you defend the game, when it's not worth $10. If it was $5, I'd consider it, but $10? I can get much better indie games for $10 and I wouldn't feel like I threw my money away. Either the price goes down, or I torrent. It's as simple as that.
softest_voice: I had no trouble with them. I replayed then each twice, and then I was done. It may be harder for some people, but I think that "a bit nuts" is a slight overstatement.
6TMK,
I agree that Rhinogamer's a moron, but this game doesn't really "show a different side of the war." It's a simple flash game where you shoot things. Please don't make it out to be more than it is.
Wait... You're name is "Psykoemo," but you're complaining about something being "lame and annoying?" You do realize how ironic that is, don't you?
Concerning the game - It was a very polished game, with good graphics, smooth gameplay, a fairly intuitive interface, and a well-rounded battle system. Overall, very well done.
It's not so much that it needs slower reproduction rates, but a smarter, more agile AI opponent. They didn't seem to understand the value of x2 repoduction cells, getting more cells to boost production, or even to take the closest cells first. The AI was atrocious, and it really killed the fun factor.
 "Creeper World Training Sim"){kind=icon}
 "Hover Bot Arena 2"){kind=icon}
 "Hexiom Connect"){kind=icon}
 "D-Day Defender"){kind=icon}
 "Brute Wars"){kind=icon}
 "Phage Wars 2"){kind=icon}