TheCircus's Comments

4/5. Nice game. However, I think it lacks substance. Having a version where you had to get through more candidates would be pretty fun. ;D

Really like this game. Nice challenge, only managed 58 on first try. 5/5.

1242. Gave this a 5/5 and was really surprised at how good it was. Awesome concept and very well executed. Dare I say it may actually deserve its place as #1. It certainly deserves to be up there somewhere.

5/5; it was a nice, fun game. Good job - quack, quack.

5/5. A little fun game which did provide quite the challenge. Good job.

Yay, I killed myself. Not a bad game really, I'll give it a 4/5 because I thought it was quite fun. Good job.

3/5. It's a pretty good idea, but it needs a bit of expanding. Like someone already said, upgrades and things like that would be pretty cool. Also, I don't know if you could maybe change how much the satellite moves when you press up or down, because it seems to move a lot off of one press for me. Yeah, you've gt the basis for a good game here though.

3/5. It's not bad really, it's okay for what it is. One things I would suggest is having the hint come up for a few seconds after you hover over it, because I accidentally went over it on my way to the chat box and I couldn't have a hint for little bit after that. But yeah, it's alright.

What the fu.. I don't even know what you're meant to do in this game. In fact, I even refreshed the page because I thought the game had glitched on me at first. Also, come up with an original name next time you make a game. 1/5.

Hey, nice game. I gave you a 4/5 because I haven't seen a game like this yet on the site with the videos having to be corrected. So yeah, good job.

Nice try for your first, but the game needs a bit of background music, and I don't like how you go back to the main menu when you lose. Other than that though, it's pretty good. 3/5.

Right.. uh, I'll give you a 2/5 because I've given games that probably took less effort than this the same. Maybe change the text at the end to English?

Meh, it doesn't look too bad for the "barebones" version. It appears all of the things I would suggest have already been taken into consideration for the complete version, so I'll give you a 3/5.

I gave it a 3/5 because it wasn't bad, however, fast mode needs to be much faster, I was literally browsing another window and just coming back every four or five balls to see what I had. Also, my score appears as 'NaN' post-game and 'NN' in-game. On a positive note, the graphics and overall look of the game are pretty cool.

1/5. What on earth are you meant to do in this game. Move your mouse? Come on, surely you have better ideas than this; put them to use.

I'll going to be really nice here and give you a 2/5 merely on the basis that I laughed when I kicked the hamster.

I actually liked this game, and although it is basically just another 'match 3' game, it is nice to see the new concepts you have (I particularly like the blocks that require a certain number of clicks before they fall.) I will give this a 4/5 because of it's innovation.

Not a bad game. I did enjoy playing it, but as others have said, it is only a 'match 3' game, which is a shame because the game on the whole is good. I'll give it a 4/5 because it is one of the better 'match 3' games I have played; good job.

1/5. With all due respect, you must be joking if you expected a better rating that this. Try and channel your time and energy into your games that have more to them than just clicking a button.

I thought it was quite fun. Good to see games on Kong that actually give out good messages too. A 4/5 for you; good job.