XiaoLong's Comments

Jan. 08, 2013

Rating: 3

I found myself questioning the surroundings and looking for stuff other than just clues to progress on the game itself. Purposes. That is simply because it is indeed a deep and meaningful experience.

Jan. 04, 2013

Rating: 2

It would be both neat and magical if there was any meaning behind all this slot machine-like mechanic. Could've put a bit of effort on that direction to turn it on a better experience and maybe even justify the brainless trial and error approach.

Jul. 09, 2009

Rating: 0

not bad.

Jan. 11, 2009

Rating: 0

"Caution: The game is pretty tough" lol. definitely not true

Jan. 06, 2009

Rating: 0

its too hard but when you get the think going well it will eventually lag the heck out and you will end up missing everything. its got a mediocre control scheme and bad overall gameplay experience. blah

Jan. 03, 2009

Rating: 0

5/5. good job

Jan. 01, 2009

Rating: 0

simply put: pathetic and utter unbalanced AI makes this game a big no-no

Dec. 29, 2008

Rating: 0

"oh boy" ...

Dec. 29, 2008

Rating: 0

this game is actually better than i thought it'd be. decent 3/5

Dec. 29, 2008

Rating: 0

. . . blah!!

Dec. 24, 2008

Rating: 0

its an OK breakout clone. good game for half an hour or so and thats about it. 3/5

Dec. 24, 2008

Rating: 0

well done art and cool music. nothing new though. 3/5

Dec. 24, 2008

Rating: 0

cool game just needs more depth. 3/5

Dec. 24, 2008

Rating: 0

gaaaaaaaaaaaah! don't play it.

Dec. 23, 2008

Rating: 0

simple and repetitive game mechanics. awful controls.

Dec. 23, 2008

Rating: 0

OK puzzle game. bit too much of luck involved though and no savepoints. 3/5

Dec. 23, 2008

Rating: 0

blah!

Dec. 23, 2008

Rating: 0

good action game for a couple minutes. just plain boring later on. 2/5

Dec. 23, 2008

Rating: 0

quite fun for a few. pretty repetitive gameplay

Dec. 23, 2008

Rating: 0

retro gameplay, gfx and sfx. shouldve been adapted more 'new school' stuff into it. e.g. checkpoints. still nice call. 3/5