congregate5's messages

But it works either way. Perhaps it is equally possible that evolution and creation happened. If so, then it is up to the individual to decide which he will place his faith in.

Using the “God could have put it there just to make it look that way” argument is valid. God would have a reason to do it— it offers an alternative, evolution, so that we must have faith in Him, not believe simply because He’s the only one to believe in. Also, if God is real, then it makes sense. Just because it can explain all physical evidence does not make it invalid.

I completely understand, but if my unsubstantial arguments are correct, then your evidence fits in with my theory. It’s not really an argument for creationism, but its an explanation for your evidence if creationism is true. Sorry if it sounded like I was pouncing on information I asked for. :)

Also, the first part of my last post doesn’t really apply to you. I’ll concede that the burden of proof rests on me because I’m the one who started the argument; sometimes I get tired of being insulted and written off as a kook, but I shouldn’t have taken that out on you.

It is your responsibility to prove us wrong if you are going to call us narrow-minded, superstitious zealots.

You may say that sedimentary layers point to billions of years of evolution on Earth, but couldn’t God have created Earth with billions of years’ worth of sediment and erosion, and even fossils?

This also goes for cosmic background radiation and universal expansion. You can’t say that the fact that we’re on a course that can be extrapolated to a certain origin means that we started there.

First, I want to apologize for the typos in my last shout.

Second, (macro-)evolution and The Big Bang are closely related, as they both oppose creationism and are both purely “scientific” explanations for the beginning of life on Earth.

Third, why does God not fit in with science? Is it impossible for the natural and supernatural to coexist? Then why is creationism not “science”? The goal of science is to find the truth. Science doesn’t mean that nothing is possible if it can’t be proven immediately. You can refuse to belive in God on the grounds that you haven’t proven Him to exist, but you can’t use that as an argument.

Fourth, if they went to church, but were still biased against God and reinforced by “science” and their teachers, don’t you think they’d just ignore what they were being taught, just as your friends claim we Christians do regarding evolution?

Last, could you give me some concrete evidence for The Big Bang? (This isn’t a sarcastic argument, I really would like some… and not a link, please, if you can help it)

Sorry for taking up so much room in your profile. Have a nice day :)

Not in insult you or anything, but I’m pretty sure its the game that messes up the keys. I may try a song and mess up (with me knowing) then when i restart the song, half of the keys I press are not registering. Also, being too hard is a good reason to not like a game because at one point, it will just get too frustrating and go to your head. also, even if it is not too hard it is definetly harder than the 2nd SCGMD. in fact, i just earned the hard badge for SCGMD2. it seemed much easier to me for no reason until I realized that playing on SCGMD3 made me better because of how much harder the songs are and because of how long it took me to get even 5 perfects.