Ah, I see, in order to beat this game you must spend a good amount of money upgrading your units (which I didn't do in the beginning). Random damage can be annoying sometimes but i find it far easier to play if you spend about half the money you earned on new troops, and other half on upgrades. Yes, I know it will mean less soldiers on the battlefield but its worth it when they deal significant damage and can activate some skills. Also for my tactics i use around a third of my army as ranged but I believe other configurations will work as good, maybe even better, as long as you upgrade them.
The game is great but the fact you added political figures (from reality) and that you brought political propaganda in this game is quite shitty. So you will get only 1 star from me for that, if you haven't put propaganda in it, it would be 5.
Well definitely a good game to start with. I encourage you to continue making games and develop your skills, and don't be afraid to try something more complex.
Half of casualties were civilians, other half were soldiers. That means 50% men (soldiers), and 50% civilians. From those 50% civilians most were women, children and elder. Since we could say that women, children and elder died at the same rate, that means that those groups died at little more than 15 %, which means: for men - 50%(soldiers) + 8%(half ef elder) + 8%(half of children) = about 66%; for women - 15% + 8%(half of elder) + 8%(half of children) = 31% for women. Remaining 3% were lost due to approximation and are not much important. Point - So little more than 66% of WWII casualties were men, and little more than 31% were women. That's what the message at the end says.
 "Just Chatting"){kind=icon}
 "10 years of fun with Kongregate"){kind=icon}
 "Fantasy Kommander"){kind=icon}
 "Crystal Story II"){kind=icon}
 "Champions Of Chaos 2"){kind=icon}
 "Caravaneer 2"){kind=icon}
 "Trader of Stories - Chapter 1"){kind=icon}
 "It's a Shore Thing"){kind=icon}
 "Mini Commando"){kind=icon}