JOHNMAN68's Comments

Jul. 18, 2009

Rating: 0

I gave it a 1/5. The rating system needs to be redone so we can add a negative score such as -5; specifically for games like this.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

Heh, you guys are luckier than me, I can't get 50k :( LOL the game is great though, 5 out of 5 for originality and humour.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

It's a solitaire card game, probably named "golf" for some unknow reason 50 years ago. Not a bad game...it's a solitaire card game though...what else can you say? It's not like it's supposed to be fantastic.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: -1

...by the way a gardening game is not the best idea for a game. Why not make a game next on "watching the paint dry." Sheeesh

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

I don't know why....bu this game runs incredibly slow on my PC. Clearly something is very wrong with this game.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: -1

I give this game a 1/5 just because of the music...would have rated lower but I never gave the game more time. BECAUSE THE MUSIC DROVE ME CRAZY! There might be a way to turn it off but I could not find the option.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

Agreed, this game goes nowhere and does not have much point to it. It's fun but needs more added to be better. Great start, needs to be updated with perhaps missions of some more "goals" otherwise it just gets dull.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

I had to give this a 4/5, I really liked it. Nver got to 600ft though....I could try but gave up.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

I agree with waht has already been said, broken combat system, FAIL! This game is the same as EVONY (which I play) however it is in real-time, too bad it wasn't done properly. Needs and update and then possibly it will be much btter. I'll only give it a 2/5

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

I like this game but again it's agem much to small for most peoples computers. I can hardly see the text, it should be upgraded to allow 1280X1064 or more resolutions. I gave it a 2/5, with improvement it could easily be a very fun and better game.

Jul. 17, 2009

Rating: 0

Just played my first game...was matched up against a guy with 1835 wins. That was the first and last time I'll be playing. I was hoping to at least be evenly matched. 1/5 rating, wish I could rate lower.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

2/5 from me...no bugs found but the game is pretty poor, could be better.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

This is stupidly hard.... Why is there no sound? Seriously, this game could have been a 5/5 instead it's fricken terrible... 1/5 due to no sound and incredibly hard levels.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: -1

Not a bad game. Sharks suck ass though.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

Got to Level 26 and could have kept going but it got dull. Still, if you want to kill some time it's a good game to try. I doubt you'll come back to play it twice though, no replay value.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

LOL, dud i keep hitting the bear, LOL 4/5...fun and easy

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

Fun game, I liked it....gave it a three though. Still worth the try if you like this genre.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

I rated a little high on this one but I really like it. I probably deserves a 3 but I gave it a 4. I love WW2 games.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

The grpahics need and improvement. The author made them look so nice but you can't see your units well enough. It's not a difficult game so why not make the graphics more simple. These graphics would be better in fullscreen not a window like we have here.

Jul. 16, 2009

Rating: 0

Like the game but I do agree it get's to hard to fast. Still....good overal game I give it a 3 out of 5. Perhaps it deserves more but this is my fair assessment so far.