Score is displayed incorrectly while in Game: I see 1280 + 1250 = 12950... sure.
Second: Constantly pressing strg / control sucks. There should be a way to change percentage more accurately and see what it is right now, without having to press lots of buttons. (like 1 = 10% to 0 = 100 %)
The scrolling is horrible! Enemys seem to team up a lot of time. Thats somewhat depressing and makes some levels more luck dependend than strategy. (Tried lots of strategies on level 9, but as long as both attack me there is no chance since they started with more units)
Having a hard limit on units is good but just losing lots of units because of a mistake that is not undoable is depressing. There could be a short term overload.
The "Big" Units are strange. I only get 1/3 or so of my units sent to the big towers, but i only get 1 unit per big unit when they enter another tower!
Maximum level of Skills? Oh it's level 9, who knew?
Max level of yourself? Oh is it 19? Or 15? Its hard to distinguish the numbers 5,6,8 and 9 with that font...
You can select the tracks you need in Leaderboard mode, but most of the tracks are in the first championship, playing that will help you gather the 200 exp even faster.
The only thing i accept: None of those reasons should be an instant 1/5 vote. It is all a part, but there is no reason i shouldn't vote lower, because of parts that didn't appeal to me. (And i heard, there are a lot of perverted guys and girls out there, that acctually like sex appeal in games...)
(hard to get into this 1k-char limit without actually counting :D )
And yes, "it is just another XY" is a reason to rate a game lower in my case. There are good TD games, i hate most of those TDs. But there are some, that are good. But most are just repeating the same old structure. Why should i vote em up for that? It is harder to detect the good ones, if there are too many "just another xy" games :P
And yes, even kreds for game relevant structures are a reason for me to vote a game lower. If it is extremly hard to play the game or not fully possible, i cant enjoy it. Here, "you can play (a part) for free, enjoy that!" is no good argument, so i vote for the part i couldnt really enjoy, because it cost me 2 hours to do something, that a bucket of kreds would have solved in 5 minutes. Most of those things are even more expensive as playing world of warcraft would be :P
I wonder, what our votes should be made of. Having fun with a game, or not, is a matter of lots of points. Does it appeal to girls? How much? If it is an action game, can i enjoy it less, because there is too much blood? If it is too difficult, can i rate it low, because i didn't enjoy it? What should i base my vote on? Am i not allowed to vote a game low because of my own reasons? If i had to like every aspect of a game to vote on it, it is useless to vote at all.
Upgrades have a minimal effect, turrents are stupid, weaponenhancement is useless. Most important? Fire rate. There is no useful other way as far as i have seen.
Sucks...
 "Survivor Bacteria V2.1"){kind=icon}
 "Achievement Unlocked 2"){kind=icon}
 "K.O.L.M."){kind=icon}
 "ControlCraft"){kind=icon}
 "Reachin' Pichin"){kind=icon}
 "Every 60 seconds"){kind=icon}
 "Robot Wants Ice Cream"){kind=icon}
 "Harmony Keeper"){kind=icon}
 "Green Bomber"){kind=icon}
 "Async Racing"){kind=icon}
 "Great Game 1/5"){kind=icon}
 "Dark Cut"){kind=icon}
 "Talesworth Adventure Ep. 1"){kind=icon}
 "Snowman Attack"){kind=icon}
 "Planet Basher"){kind=icon}
 "Shopping Cart Hero 2"){kind=icon}
 "Mechanics"){kind=icon}