krinndnz's Comments

Comment
Hack Slash Crawl	Jun. 04, 2011 Rating: -16 This is the worst NetHack clone I've seen in quite a while. Terrible.
Topsy Turvy	Jan. 22, 2011 Rating: 0 Although it's cute and has some virtues, Topsy Turvy is derivative and shows a poor grasp of game design issues, especially level design.
Monsters' Den: Book of Dread	Nov. 14, 2010 Rating: -20 It would be nice if not all characters were "he."
Doodle God	Nov. 10, 2010 Rating: -35 This is a bad game, a two-star game on its own merits, and then gets dinged a star for problematic cultural assumptions all over the place. It is such a phoned-in, half-assed, conventional, unoriginal, artless game.
Caesary	Jun. 02, 2010 Rating: 4 This game is the same old Kingory/Civony/Evony scam again, with a new coat of paint on it. Avoid, avoid, avoid.
Dynamic Systems	May. 17, 2010 Rating: -8 Concept is nice, but the creator wants to monetize this game way, way too much. Ugh.
Polygonal Fury	May. 15, 2010 Rating: 338 I hope that PF2 comes soon - this one is great fun, and it'd be lovely to have badges. Yes, we are all total badge-whores. :D
Epsilon	May. 11, 2010 Rating: 0 I'm liking the fake Black Sun Empire music.
Cursed Treasure: Don't Touch My Gems!	May. 08, 2010 Rating: 0 It's pretty fun, but you have a serious balance problem: ninjas. Ninjas are not fun, and they're the only actually difficult enemy in the game. As a result, the game lacks serious decision-making because the only enemy you really have to care about is ninjas. The answer to everything else is "more." More towers/upgrades/whatever.
Dog Eat Dog	Apr. 02, 2010 Rating: 0 Terrible UI/UX choices - dog size, hitboxes, how much does it take to get bigger, speed, all sorts of things. Go play Amorphous for a much better game based on the same mechanic. Unless you really hate dogs.
SteamBirds	Mar. 30, 2010 Rating: 1 Overall, a big disappointment, especially considering the ArmorGames track record.
SteamBirds	Mar. 30, 2010 Rating: 1 Great premise, but major implementation flaws. Reliable information about the game state isn't presented to the player (e.g. range of weapons), both through oversight and through bug (e.g. it's pretty frequent for the mouseover status for a plane to just Not Work). Also, a gradual volume-control slider is much more useful than on/off.
99 Bricks	Feb. 13, 2010 Rating: 0 Friction in the game world is set way too low. Game feels unfair, arbitrary, luck-based.
MoneySeize	Dec. 19, 2009 Rating: 0 Massive problems with controls - if the controls worked right, it'd be merely difficult, in a good way. Right now, it's just frustrating because it feels like it doesn't reward jumping through the hoops.
Art Game	Oct. 23, 2009 Rating: 1 I'm a sucker for meta-commentary, but still.
Crush the Castle Players Pack	Sep. 26, 2009 Rating: 0 Good premise, but poor difficulty scaling. Most of your par-2s should be par-1s, about half of your par-1s should be par-2s, and your par-3 should definitely be a par-2. Also you've set the coefficient of friction just a smidge too high.
Crush the Castle Players Pack	Sep. 26, 2009 Rating: 0 Fun, but some notable flaws. There's no reason to switch between ammo types - it's all strictly upgrades.
Caravaneer	Sep. 20, 2009 Rating: 0 Moderately interesting, but the long game suffers a lot.
SeppuKuties	Sep. 16, 2009 Rating: 0 I like this game's sense of humor - it'd be interesting to see more comments from the animals, but I can see how it might clutter things. ArmorGames has a good eye for quality.
Robot Dinosaurs That Shoot Beams When They Roar	Sep. 16, 2009 Rating: 0 Three stars: an amusing novelty, fulfills its own ambitions, but goes a little long, and isn't a game I'd return to.