You see, if Kongregate allows people to rate sponsored games, they get revealed for the failures they are. This one isn't the worst - it's boring and mediocre, and poorly coded, but whatever.
Another one of those "click haphazardly until stuff happens" games that's solvable without thinking, and lacks any real logic or gameplay. Not that we have enough of those already, but oh well.
Actually, for it to be fair, it would probably have to be at least 100 billion, and it still wouldn't be fair. Although, after a while, money wouldn't exactly matter.
The comment made by Suiseisexy is going to be relentlessly downrated because it is not unanimously positive.
Incidentally, this game needs a time attack - it would work well with the risk-reward stuff you have going on here.
No, you can't use "First game" as an excuse for poor quality. Then again, I don't think I've ever played a good "drag object to end, avoid walls" type of game.
 "de Blob 2 Revolution"){kind=icon}
 "Neil the Nail"){kind=icon}
 "Anti-Idle: The Game"){kind=icon}
 "Tentacle Wars"){kind=icon}
 "Love"){kind=icon}
 "Great Dungeon in the Sky"){kind=icon}
 "All We need is Brain"){kind=icon}
 "Drop Dead 2"){kind=icon}
 "Feed the King"){kind=icon}
 "The Awesome Game"){kind=icon}
 "Pandemic 2"){kind=icon}
 "Reincarnation: All Hallow's Evil"){kind=icon}
 "Mass Mayhem"){kind=icon}