Before you get mad at me for saying this I still give it 4/5. now i used to be into game making. you said you need funding for a sequel one. First making weapon upgrade section, is not that hard. And you said "trying new styles of ships and blowing stuff up in new ways" This kind of game has been done many times in flash-game history. is more like a bubble tanks 3.5 Last nobody likes people telling them to give a 5/5 Mostly cause we all know that your also trying to get the kongregate prize money, especially because the prize this month is 3,000$ not 1,500$ But it's still a okay game! :)
Before you get made at me for saying this I still give it 4/5. now i used to be into game making. you said you need funding for a sequel one. First making weapon upgrade section, is not that hard. And you said "trying new styles of ships and blowing stuff up in new ways" This kind of game has been done many time in flash-game history. is more like a bubble tanks 3.5 Last nobody likes people telling them to give a 5/5 Mostly cause we all know that your also trying to get the kongregate prize money, especially because the prize this month is 3,000$ not 1,500$ But it's still a okay game! :)
Mostly we are requesting that players not hold ratings ransom, in other words give low ratings until their requested feature is implemented. ie. "I would have given you 4/5 but right now 1/5 until you add flying pony guns!" We also had someone rate the game 1/5 because they "knew we could do better." That's what we are trying to discourage. If you think the game is a 4/5 on it's merits, by all means rate away. But shooter games are a whole genre of games. We tried to make a fun shooter, simple as that, nothing complicated. But if everyone gave just us 1/5's because they know we made Bubble Tanks as well, well that's kind of unfair to us.
Lol, all I tried to do was better explain myself.