Is the paladin THAT much worse than the vampire... I seem to think that the vampire is like 3 or 4 times better. Comparing abilities: 100% dmg to skeles vs 12% chance to do 32% dmg to all enemies on screen. Since the dangerous enemies imo are gobbos (dual attack chance, ranged attack every turn later on) and Beholders/Eyeball thingies/we u call them(immune to poly/freeze/spelldmg) the pally is not very good here ADV: Vampire. 20% chance to gain 8 hp or 20% chance to block half dmg: vamp wins until enemies have 16ish dmg ADV: Vampire. Ressurect at ?% health vs Weaken targets but chance to weakly hit skele Adv: Pally. Starting dmg/health: the pallys health bonus is completely offset by the large amount of dmg taken early game because the vamp is twice as good attacking before sword upgrades Adv Vamp: Conclusion Vampire wins 3 to 1
Soon...you will get there. I'm wandering at about er...oh wait, i got the maximum score possible- 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 >_> Only 3 others have achieved my feat... LOL.
Well that makes 6 whales, tip: treat shields like enemies, hold your mouse under the ground line so that when you hit a gun you don't shoot, and grenades are your best friend (+500)
high scores somehow got reset? i had over 70,000 and was 4th at one point... on the other hand high score isnt as fun as saving them whales, 5 times! Should be a 60 pt badge given how hard it is to complete
Soon...you will get there. I'm wandering at about er...oh wait, i got the maximum score possible- 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 >_> Only 3 others have achieved my feat... LOL.