Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A few things I am would like:
Shift click to lock instead of hold button.
See the locked sum so far and how much more to remove. Right now it shows the enabled sum as a help, which is good but when you need to remove 34 it can be annoying.
Then again, some mental gymnastics is good for the brain.
Also, this thing is way too addictive and one-more-itis inducing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm not overly fond of the 8x8 2-4 one, have to make guesses and even though there are many solutions, sometimes your guesses are wrong.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really love this game. I think you should add a hint button as other math game like 0h n0 does to boost my motivation in time of need.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i love theese kinda games.. any w/ numbers/shapes/colors and require people w/ pure math logic can solve them.. just love this so much
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I can solve any puzzle in a few milliseconds. Using a solver I made myself. The hard part is filling in all the input and marking the answer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ah the fastest way to earn the first badge is to find a board with 2 high numbers. This way you MUST use certain ones and can then lock the row. Or use rows with very low numbers so that you can lock out any higher number. Please + to keep at top.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"The puzzle is randomly generated so you'll never get bored of playing"; actually, guess-and-check all over an 8x8 board gets boring real quick.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The 8x8 2-4 level is incredibly difficult, and required a lot of guessing and going around in circles for me to figure out. My strategy was to write down which numbers must be activated and just guess with the ones that could be either on or off.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is actually not a good puzzle because the solution is NOT unique. Tested and proven myself. There are multiple solutions to one puzzle. So even if you were to guess, you have to calculate almost ALL the steps in advance TO THE VERY END of the puzzle to know if your guess is right or wrong. And this is assuming there is only one branch where both paths can be correct. If there were two, you would have to make even more calculations, where one is already impossible for the human brain. Furthermore, there is no way to mark guesses. This is a good idea for a puzzle game but poorly implemented puzzle generation. If you are going to make a puzzle this complicated, MAKE SURE THE SOLUTION IS UNIQUE.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what ???? so game say 5x5 so i chose 5x5 to do it coz i no tats 19 so i go to 5x5 but teirs no 19 to clic nowere ????? how can i do it if te rite anser isnt teir nowere ???? pls fix bug devloper til ten 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I had to make a note to get the 8x8 2-4 solved, but then it was no problem. If someone needs help just write a PM :-)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
At first I thought this was really hard. But then I realized the trick is to first eliminate the numbers that can't add up to the outside numbers with any combination. (I.E. in the first puzzle, 4 can't add with 2 or 3 to get 5) And the rest came pretty naturally.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is a fun little puzzle game, but oftentimes you truly do need to guess. It becomes very obvious when you get a 2-4 puzzle that ends with a square of four 2s. You can win by removing two diagonally across from each other, but it doesn't matter which two you remove. So yeah, sometimes there's more than one answer, don't let others tell you otherwise. It's just that they have yet to run into one such puzzle.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"you shouldn't need to guess" says people who haven't been trying to do puzzle 81 on endless mode for two months. I'll get there in the end, but, you know... stop
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As others have said, locking helps. Also, there is no need to *guess*, even on the 8x8 modes. You can slowly piece it together with logic. Start with rows where you can confirm or eliminate numbers easily. e.g. if a row needs 30, but with ALL numbers active, is at 35, then you know that any number greater than 5 MUST be in the answer. You can lock those as confirmed. You can also lock any number where it would be impossible to get the answer if there are no other numbers that could pair with it. e.g. in the above example, if there is a 4, but no 1's, then the 4 MUST be in the answer as it would be impossible to remove the 4 without breaking it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Note: 8x8 2-4 level may have more than one answer.(I had did a puzzle that contains at least 2 available answers.) It is better if you use excel to do it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Welcome to my exhaustive list of favorite games (all both of them). This is actually more fun than kakuro, which I once thought was the only math-based game I'd ever enjoy. 2-4 is a bit aggravating, granted, but the other modes make this a hands-down favorite. If I were to change anything, it'd be allowing me to pick colors for circles, backgrounds, and such, just because I want to try a Joker-themed set-up.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
took me a bit to click. it was super challenging until I red I could lock numbers. then I started looking at it sort of like Sudoku in my mind. not same rule sets but just the way my brain clicks with shit like this. came for the achievements. Stayed for the chill =) well done
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That moment when you find a logically solvable 8x8 2-4 :D (It had 6 and 8 in first wow and 8th column, so its was close to a 7x7). Great game, nice concept!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
to me, this is a great spinoff to Picacross, with great zen-like music but more math. (granted they are two completely different games but they both play well and similar to each other.)