Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I had a 2700 point lead after gaining 3350 points from a back to back triple pair in a single round, then the CPU rallies in the next round and gets back to just 50 points behind me. I call shenanigans! DX
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've just played 8 times, but I think I can guess the rules CPU uses to play and I don't think the game is biased at all. Just take in account probabilities. If you roll a single die you have just a 2/6 chance of getting points, so it's better to bank the score unless you're on the trail for a lot of points.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It sometime ammuses me how people scream "cpu cheating" and i start to wonder if they are just trolling because the read the description or if they really are the brainless [...] the are repressenting.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't mind the computer being a nervous Nelly and saving every so often. What I mind is how it appears to be getting the 1500 point triple pairs every 5th (opening)roll. This coupled with its ability to rake in 500 points a round means it gets ridiculously hard to win unless you can pull of some multi-thousand rounds.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When we played this in college, it was called "Farkle." Game is a lot of fun, but there's nothing like being around a table with 4-5 other people and seeing a 6000 point final run.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I guess the Easy and Medium texts are messed up. Reckless is harder than Cautious.
And why I can re-roll the dice deciding who will start the game if I'm fast enough?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I had a free roll, and i used it, but i had a Zilch for that free roll, get it? :/ Guess it's a bug because u used to have a NOTHING with 500 points.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
WE ALL KNOW this scenario: you roll a single one, bank, roll a single five, bank, roll a single one, bank, roll a single five, bank, zilch. IT WILL HAPPEN every time if you have one thousand or more points then your opponent. it is rigged.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Also, I would NOT have hated this game IF the game did NOT state any word "Skill" at all. If you want to see skill, play some tennis, football, MMOFPS, reaction time tests, solve a=a+1,solve a^9!^9^9! or anything.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
And because it's gonna win the leaderboard, I just rated it 1/5 and not 2/5, the maker does NOT get my support for lying to the masses. It's not a good gameplay, huge luck involved, and the CPU is rigged.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Someone even complained that the computer is not rigged and showed that blog which the maker wrote...
If you want to prove it, give the .fla document. This is NOT argue about everything.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Solid entry, Gaby. Computer seems to get lucky more often than me, but the game seems pretty fair. Awards are a nice touch. Add multiplayer and possibly some unlockables (new dice designs?) for the awards, and you've got a winner. 5/5, favorited, and I want to see badges. This is great.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the game. Small issue: In deciding who plays first, you can roll twice if you're fast enough, essentially giving you two chances to roll.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
omg i cant get to bank more than 350 becouse of zilch every time and the computer always rackes in 3000+
and its on easy difficulty WTF?!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is my favorite game in Kongregate. I really really really really loved!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5/5 and totally favorited. I hope this game get some badges, I would be so happy!!!!!