Under rating threshold (hideshow)
WOW is all i can say, the computer on easy got like 2000 points in row 3 times, wtf, game is retarded, maybe the creator should actually play his game before releasing it and see how bad it is.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good game, though, I simulated a game to 9.950 score with player 1 and 2, at that stage I tried to get a score from 15.000+, in atleast 70 maybe even 100 throws I didn't even got close to a score of 4k, did had 2.8k but my luck defently didn't come.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i wished it was a 1 over 199 rating, i would give it a 1/100 because the AI just got a immediate win all free roll, what's that? obviously rigged
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I would say this game is about saying "stop" in wright moment. If u want to get to many points, u loose. If u have 3 dices u can roll, but rolling with 2 dieces is a bad idea.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have a different version of this where a three-of-a-kind can be glitched to get all your dice back :D Anyways, would be fun if it loaded. (Not rated) By the way, you only think it's rigged because your brain makes a bigger deal of it when it is against you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Somehow it seems that the RNG is in the CPU's favor. I've had the computer rolling +5k several times against me by just getting free rolls all the time.
Sure, it's RNG so anything can happen. But still feels annoying to play when that sort of stuff continously happens.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the game but I think it is fixed in the computers favor. As I got over 10000 for the win and the computer only had 8400, the computer did a final roll and wouldn't you know it, it got 4 free rolls in a row each by rolling a single die and raped me for 50 points. This would have gone on my favorites if not for that blatant computer cheating. As it stands I will give it a 3/5 for the concept.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
lonely_umbrella, you can use your keyboard to lock specific dice.
this games great. except when the computer hits those sextet 1's.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You know... with all those rows of awards for winning and loosing in various ways... ther isn't one for beating 10,000 points and still loosing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
One complaint:
The CPU is allowed to take just a single one when there are two ones but the player is not. The only option is to take 2 ones. That should be two separate scoring options so the player can decide if its worth using up two dice in this way. Same goes for single five versus three fives, etc.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game has horrible design, as there really isn't any interaction with your opponent and the best choice is always clearly visible. 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So in my first non-tutorial game I got ahead by a couple thousand points and the computer came back with a couple thousand point rolls, followed by a whopping 4350 point turn. Which seemed rigged to me lol, but after playing it a while I think it's just that lucky hands are a lot more common then what I was expecting. Of course I can't tell for sure, without solving the game. Some random number generators will sometimes cluster results, in an effort to appear more natural. But that can lead to it repeating the same number too many times. Assuming the dev is for real (I don't know why they'd lie) it might be worth looking into. Like just have it print out 100 random numbers from 1-6 and see if you're getting an unusually high numbers of repeats, and then if you are work on ways to make it more random. There should be lots of resources on the net about how to do that.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Seems a lot like blackjack, in that you need to know when to stay and when not to. Definitely a little bit more than a "little" luck involved. Still, I enjoy it. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I can tell that you are frustrated by the accusations of CPU cheating, but... when he rolls a 1-2-3-4-5-6, a nothing, and a 3 pairs all immediately in a row, it's just hard to think of anything else! What method of randomization do you use?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wow...let's QQ some more about getting owned by the computer. Yes, there is a sense of skill via pressing your luck, and it's kind of comparable to the tower card game from the Fable 2 Pub Games.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I find it very interesting that in three games straight, I beat the reckless fellow by 2000 points, and suddenly he scores three sixes, three fives, and then 1-2-3-4-5-6, then three more sixes.
In fact, he never pulls anything like this unless I'm very far ahead of him.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game sucks... I would say it is purely luck but there is maybe a few percent skill involved... but still all luck as far as I am concerned... I have played a few rounds and it is pretty easy to win but a lot of the time the computer get multiple free rolls. That is yet to happen when I roll
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i agree with poochy, i was originally thinking it was more yahtzee style where you can hold certain dice and build up a good score, but alas it is not, making the luck factor of the dice combinations essential
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think the "great skill and a little luck" in the description is a little off, if only because of the great weight of the rolls that are pure dumb luck (nothing, 3 pairs, and 1-2-3-4-5-6).