Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Cautious just rolled five ones and a three, and decided to roll again rather than bank it. >_<
I like this game a lot, though find that cautious will do some things that are more reckless than Reckless.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Uhh
I keep losing from reckless.
Why..
Because when he's behind whith like 4000 points he keeps earning 5000 in one round.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wow reckless zilched only once...
times computer got a free roll from rolling one die 3/4
me 0/5
good game but i swear its cheating
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
OneFreeMan: I don't really get it. The player who goes first DOES have a huge advantage because of this feature. If the second player reaches the 10K threshold, the first one has one more roll to beat that score. So the first player has one more rolls than the second one.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I take back what I first said about this game. I gave it more time and it turns out I was being an idiot. Once you get the hang of it, you tend to do better. Don't give up after a few games, instead start to get the feel of the game, and how the rules work out.
Good game, sorry I was too impatient before.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Small Savings Badge (easy – 5 points)
Bank 10,000 total points in Zilch
You acquired this badge on Nov. 18, 2008.
Makin' Bank Badge (medium – 15 points)
Bank at least 3,000 points in a single turn in Zilch
You acquired this badge on Nov. 28, 2008.
Fool's Gold Badge (hard – 30 points)
Earn 100 awards in Zilch
100 awards unlocked – If you've already achieved any of these badges, you must complete a single game for them to be awarded. Currently: 54.
46 more
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's not a bad game, but the fact, that the first player has one more rolls if the second player reached 10K is a bit unfair.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I know for a fact that this game is rigged because if I play against myself on two-player mode, both sides get decent rolls. If I play against the computer, I get terrible rolls every time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Woah Rubybear, try spelling some of your words out. People might be able to read your comments, then. And it might make you seem a little bit more intelligent. :/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great game. Need a bit of luck, but in the end that is the same for everybody. Most important is knowing when to stop and when to attempt another role. Chance calculation and risk assesment. Would be nice to see an impossible badge for all 120 awards. I am at 113 myself atm, but the last 7 will take a lot more hours.
5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree that the game relies alot on luck. Thankfully, quitting the game doesn't ruin your winning streak.
All you need now is patience.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For being so one sided like everyone keeps saying, I have had no problems with the computer running 4000+ point hands. It gets the occasional 3000 pointer but no more than I do, in fact I think I do it more often than the computer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Noobs the hard badge shouldn't be impossible because it isnt. Anyway there would be too many points for this game then
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Its funny why the most pathetic peopel rate it 1/5 just because they suck and have no tactics in this game except, ROLL ROLL ROLL.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
its a shit game what based almost only on luck. and its hard badge should be impossible like amorpous's. coz i dont care anymore with this game even with 68 awards.... 5/1
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fool's Gold
Dude! You just completed the Fool's Gold achievement in Zilch and won the Fool's Gold badge and 30 points!
ONLY TOOK 20 HOURS
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree with TwoToneTech, awesome game, i played this game all the time when i was younger. We called it Beano but ive heard other names too. The ppl who complain have never played the real game. GJ 5/5