Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Zilch

« Back to Zilch

omegaone

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) despite how skilled you are, luck is still the ruling factor. p.s. boring.

+ - !

(0)

iPigeonDeux

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) fun

+ - !

(0)

Balneger

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Oh my ffing god, I don't like this. I lost some of my awards... That's not cool.

+ - !

(0)

Nitewolf

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) it's nice, but it's more a game of great luck and a little skill :p

+ - !

(0)

jingks

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) yeah amber... i think a *zilch is when you get a zilch but had at least 300 points.

+ - !

(0)

Amber1713

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) so, let me get this straight (Zilch) = a zilch you couldn't help but make and (*Zilch)= a zilch that's your fault?

+ - !

(0)

dazzlingboy

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) good game good game. enjoyed that.

+ - !

(0)

kamp

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) A great game. I need to start playing this out in the real world

+ - !

(0)

AliKaZam

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Learnt a similar game to this from a canadian chick. Even bought some dice recently to play it myself. excellent.

+ - !

(0)

quake

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) need music

+ - !

(0)

drplaster

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) This Sucks.......

+ - !

(0)

jingks

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) PROTIP: do not take a single or double five unless 1) it's your only option 2) you are banking that turn 3) it'll get you a free roll... otherwise discard them. those claiming it's not random, maybe try taking notes from how the computer plays... my current record is 8-2.

+ - !

(0)

Cesar_Damm

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I liked it, it's not easy to create a game like this with all these rules..5/5

+ - !

(0)

jingks

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) all my awards saved...

+ - !

(0)

satorian

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I'd say he has to fix a few things before it gets badged. It's a great little time waster game with good graphics. BUT: 1) the badges disappear if you navigate away; and 2) i think there may be something wrong with the randomizer. I've played maybe 50 games, and have yet to get two 1500pt free rolls in a row. The computer is getting them every game. Others have noticed it. I don't know why, and I'm not saying the author rigged it, but I would take a look at how you do randomizing in the code.

+ - !

(0)

yogsloth

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Awards don't save! That's teh suck!

+ - !

(0)

Bizkit

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Randomness my @#!, Computer banked 10 times total/10 rolls total in the game winning with over 12,000, now come on over 1000 per bank and not one zilch even though (Cautious) would roll even when he had only one die remaining and well over a grand banked already and I roll once have to keep one die for 50 and with 5 die remaining zilch out every time

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) This entire game is just a stochastics problem.

+ - !

(0)

Seledoz

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) The awards dont save...

+ - !

(0)

ndf9876

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I'm dubious about the authors' claim it isn't rigged in favour of the CPU, but still a decent enough waste of 15 minutes. 4/5

+ - !

(0)

Rybinov

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) there needs to be a better oxplanation of how to play. i dont get it at all

+ - !

(0)

roomiller

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Needs badges

+ - !

(0)

carlcon

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Twice in a row I've gotten over 10,000 and been 2000-3000 points ahead, and after the computer sucking all game it pulled out uber scores and beat me both time. I have to question the randomness of that.

+ - !

(0)

Edor

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Nazeris, if you do the math the chance of not getting a 1 or a 6 is 8,6percent. And thats not even all scoring combos, so it's really unlikey but it happens from time to time

+ - !

(0)

endymion

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) The second time I played the game all my awards were gone

+ - !

(0)

neutral_grey

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Pretty decent. Sad that you can't save awards. Also, you should never be able to zilch a free roll considering the scoring. That means the free roll should also be automatic.

+ - !

(0)

Nazeris

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) How can you say the game isn't rigged when every time you role for the first time you get points. Granted you've got six dice and a third chance of getting points on each but there'd at least be a few instances. The randomness is too perfect.

+ - !

(0)

savagex

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I find it odd that Cautious always wins with a score of 10600 and rarely rolls less than 800

+ - !

(0)

Snipeshot

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) this games sucks really relly hard!

+ - !

(-1)

GMAN136

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) this game is crap

+ - !

(0)

remade

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Badge it! Badge it! :D I heart this game.

+ - !

(0)

hastingsfc

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) yeah you say it's not fixed but the lowest score the computer has had against me is 950 in one turn and it has never zilched...

+ - !

(0)

eleu

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) computer scored 13000 pts. in one turn. got 1-6 run 4 times in a row. very random...

+ - !

(0)

badgecrasher

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) If you get less than 300 points you can't continue. It's part of the rules. It doesn't suck because of the rules. 5/5

+ - !

(0)

gothlordboon

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) OMG OMG i used to play this game with my mom like 8 years ago... we called it the dice game... cool

+ - !

(0)

IsaKlui

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) The game's size doesn't fit into kongregate's window, is anyone having this problem too?

+ - !

(0)

KingofDisco

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) This is fun as hell. But I would agree that this is more of a time killer than a player game.

+ - !

(0)

macky519

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) this sucks if u dont get at least 300pts u cant continue >:(

+ - !

(0)

Shelbie86

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I like it. But it's really addictive and frustrating! I keep missing free rolls! But 4/5. Love the graphics.

+ - !

(0)

H1000

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) why does only the computer has many combos?... and me not T_T

+ - !

(0)

hainesyboy

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) rubbish 1/5

+ - !

(0)

Jimbobobitybob

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Greed, just computerised.

+ - !

(0)

epper

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I've played this game before but it was called farcle. fun game nicely made

+ - !

(0)

Ottar

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Funny game, still some bugs, but realy worth playing

+ - !

(0)

urbs

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) nice game... tho a bit too dependent on luck more than skill

+ - !

(0)

Izilthir

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) It's 95% luck 5% skill 1/5

+ - !

(0)

sad_yoda

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) computer's luck is definitely better than human's. cpu scored more than 5000 in twice in a row, when i was leading by 3000

+ - !

(0)

bridea

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) If this is all based on luck, how can you have varying difficulties for the computer opponent?

+ - !

(0)

Senadeie

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Game isn't rigged but it's also in no way skilled based. I play this game with my friends all the time (no the designer is NOT the original rule maker of this game, ZIlch is a very very old dice game) and trust me, it's 99% luck based.

+ - !

(0)

AtomicKitKat

Nov. 06, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I have no beef with gaby, but seriously, there's "probable", and then there's "You have to be ****ing kidding me!", like when you score 3k points in a round, and the CPU then repeats your feat(with similar results, at that).

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Code of Conduct
© 2026 Kongregate