Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When there is one die and I haven't racked up a massive score I usually go for it because theres a 20% chance it will be a 1 or a 5 which will mean I get a free roll. great game 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
to xyuzhg: being cautious yourself will lower your top score in one go as you aren't risking it very much. you need to risk things more and sometimes you will get a big score in one go
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't honestly think that there is too much a difficulty increase between Cautious and Reckless. On Cautious the computer doesn't zlich on purpose like Reckless. Oh, and I rolled a straight straight 800 points. Woot!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's like any gambling game, You will lose for absolutely no reason. You will be 100 points away from winning and your opponent will roll 3000 points and beat you. That is the way it is with cold, hard lady luck! Deal with it and enjoy. So suck it up, lose, and be happy you are playing a great game. Also Kactus, you are a freakin genius. 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i don't know what everybody's doin wrong but i think it's a good game.
no massive losses and stuff maybe you're only paying atention when you lose but i win a lot of times to so don't say the game is rigged or something just say you lose sometimes to ^^. that's nothing weird you can't always win a game it wouldn't be fun that way
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It seems like people notice the slights against themselves more often than not. When the CPU gets 3 zilches in a row, you barely notice. However, when the CPU gets lucky, you go "WFT?!?! its impossible to win!! the computer keeps on getting infinity points!!" I also noticed that on reckless, after getting lucky, they usually zilches several time thereafter.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok, roughly 15 out of 1,000 people will start up a game and the computer will RANDOMLY roll a straight, giving them 1,500 points and a free roll. This game has 1,672,488 plays. So we could expect that around 25,000 people would have this happen to them. What's the bet that they all post in the comments to bitch? Well there are only 722 pages of comments so far, though the number of plays will probably be multiple. 12,839 Favourited and a rating of 4/5, so clearly quite a few people know what RANDOM means. If you post to complain about the random number generator, remember you are less intelligent than 12,839 people.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You know what I like? That you can quit out of a game and it won't count as a win or a loss or break your streak. Which gives me an idea...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hmm, the commenters really seem to be rigged against the developer. This needs to be fixed!!!!!!!
If anyone wants they can read the code he posted, to check that it's fair. You can post what ACTUALLY happened and I'll tell you the chances of that happening (I can't do much with "OMG THE COMPUTER GOT A BRAZILLION POINTS").
Also please remember that you are one of a brazillion people that have played this game. Everything that is remotely possible will have happened to someone. You should be like "wow, I feel really lucky, I saw something totally rare like the computer beat me in one turn! Good thing I wasn't playing for money :)"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good game but when u roll your lucky to get a 1. then the computer rolls and gets a few thousand points and rolls again. this game is rigged in favor of the computer
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the author changed the random rolling. No longer is it "easy" to win against reckless. Way too lucky, and on my own rolls, i get nothing. nothing to go up against his 3000 on one turn. Needs fixed. Getting a one star from me now
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1500 first roll, yay free roll. one 1 for 100 points, 5 dice left, what are the chances i won't roll a 1 or 5 next roll? BUT I FNG ZILCH ANYWAY! THIS HAPPENS ALL THE FNG TIME! FIX THIS SHIT!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't think it is rigged! It just also a change spell so sometimes you have luck other times not. The problem is with the realist mode, that it plays really realistic and it doesn't makes mistakes. Because it is a computer. Anyway i really like the game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I tried to play a bit more to get a better idea of the gameplay so I could give an accurate reading, but I had to quit because I found it was too frusterating to see single 1's and 5's roll after roll after roll after roll after roll after roll, while the computer scored endless points and free rolls. Sorry, but until you make a fair game, I gotta give this a 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
lol as soon as I posted the below comment I get 4 free rolls in a row and end up banking 4500... way to make me eat my words lmao
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I dont care what some of these people think, this game IS in favor of the computer. A majority of the time, the computer goes first... I dont know how many free rolls I've seen the computer get followed by triple, quad, and triple double rolls. Whenever I seem to get ahead the computer suddenly starts rolling 1500+ and I suddenly start getting 5-6 zilches in a row. How coincidentally convenient.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is an obvious rig. Every time I'm at 8000+ and ahead the computer gets quad free rolls and about 3000+ points.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Pakris
There was an update
Updates
Some useful blog posts about the CPU players, why it’s all random and why Realist takes single dice. Also, I’m bored with people saying it’s rigged. You try to make a fun game that you enjoy playing and people hurl abuse and vitriol at you for making it fair.
Want to know what all the awards are?
Fixed bugs: 500 points for three pairs bug, CPU sticking bug, who goes first bug, …
show more
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is really fun, but it is like, totally rigged. I've lost like 9 times in a row to Reckless. Seriously. I never get near as many points, he beat my by like, 7.5k one time... Its fun, but could be a lot more if it wasn't soo rigged seeming. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Congratulations! You just won the Fool's Gold Badge and 30 points!
100 awards unlocked... I just had a 3650 score to come from behind and win by 50...lucky yes, skill maybe some, rigged...i doubt it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I recognize the luck part, but I don't see the "great skill" in playing this game. Of cause, you can engage any probability theory when thinking about your turns, but that's worth not a penny if the dice don't take the trouble to exactely follow the standard distribution during the few turns of your current game. - Just scored 10,000 against the CPU - because it zilched 8 times, surely not because of my zilching skills.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay yeah there is some rigging. I had 10300point. the comp has 2500 and got 6 free rolls in a row to beat me by 100 points