Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For people complaining about they're flashplayer hogging your CPU the latest flash does not jive with the newest version of Firefox
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really liked this game. I only played as Amea, so I could easily memorize and understand every single one of her movies. No need to make a list like I normally do. And I also like how the challenge room shows us how to do the more advanced combos........ On hard mode the enemy ALWAYS uses pre-canned attack patters. So getting mildly hit will start an attack segment that lasts 30 seconds and deals 33 damage. EVERY TIME. Feels really annoying and cheap. One way to minimize this is to somehow let the player have some control over their body while stunned: like recovering, unstunning for 10% of health, being able to move where your body "falls"...... It took me a while but I finally figured out why I didn't like Amea's clothing. It is because you see red, blue and green (the three primary colors) at the same time. And the colors are really dark .
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Zombie Inglor seems a bit OP as an opponent. He's huge and strong. literally a walking tank. His pile driver, while it can be countered and stopped, is un-blockable and takes out a fifth of your health alone. So he combines that with another attack then repeats until he's defeated, can use an even stronger move, or decides your not worth his pile driving skills. But i'm not saying he's too hard, by far he's very beatable even on hard just like all the hero's. overall its a pretty ok game 4/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Game works well on IE, sadly on FF for me happens the same what Irasfel wrote. Otherwise very nice fighting game, but please fix those performance issues.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lagging out like a crazy son of a bitch, can't even minimize the window or close it once it starts. Had to ctrl-alt-delete and endtask flash to get control back. Latest firefox/flash, computer not made out of wood, something's not right here. Also, oddly, it appeared to run 2 instances of flash - one taking over 30% of my CPU's attention, the other about 5%. So umm - get back to me when it doesn't do that?