Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Xelrionix, I don't think that's why it's called Christmas. I always interpret it as Christ-mas, nad if another s is added, you have Christ-mass. YAY!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Physics need improvement, otherwise it would be a good game. IMO they should have been fixed for the first game instead of making a x-mas pack. Broken game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Done all levels using no wood, wood is stupid and breaks far too easily.
I suggest harder levels, using steal makes it simple.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the game and all, but I have to hate you anyway for jumping on the CHRISTMAS STARTS MONTHS IN ADVANCE bandwagon.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well regardless of it's stregth, I still perfer steel over wood. Actually I beat alot of the levels with steel. With the ones I didn't, I used a couple wood segments to save money to complete my bridge. I actually think steel is better because it means you require less segments in your bridge so theres less places for your bridge to collaspe at.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Steel helps inthe right places. Its best at being a hanging support. Remember, arches have the most strength, so always build the bridges with at least a slight arch in it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ReinFrenchments - Regardless of the additional strength and strategic placement, the steel can hardly support ITSELF let alone the bridge.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ Steakish: You can use the two collums on the bottem for support... I did a sloppy job but those collums really helped.
@ Timmeh7o7
Steel may be heavier, but you can make one segment of steel almost twice as long. Personally I think steel is stronger as it seems more weight can be put on them.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The additional joint strength of steel is negligible at the very best... I spend much more money on steel just to find that it weakens my bridge due to the weight. Overall, this gets a 2/5... Steel should help, not hinder.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Guys look, the first level isn't "that" hard. I beat it with $1260 to spar and with only 7 segments.
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p136/the_lost_hero1/bridge.jpg
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sorry, i didn't find this game very fun. I like bridge building style games, but this one wasn't very realistic. Good attemt, But lacking something....... 3/5
@Red Devil- Who cares if its not December..
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Also it would've been sweet if you added another challange mode like in the first one where have to make your bridge go as far as it can with the money that you saved from the levels. :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what a lame game it is so stupid u cannot beat it the first lvl is impossible it is just stupid because no matter what you do you lose
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I beat the levels... I think level 29 was the hardest, because you had a giant gapping hole in the middle with only 1 side to build from, but afterwords, the levels tended to go much quicker. Alot of the levels though I would end up with barely any money left though. Finished with $8968.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
much tougher than the first one (good), physcics seem off (bad). I like presents (very good), but I want mah turkey first (bad) 3/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
3 Thing to remember: Triangles, Weight, Force of Gravity.
--Triangles are the strongest shape.
--High weight of UPPER supports is a no-no.
--Force of Gravity, how much space is there BETWEEN the sides of the gap.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Tip for first level:
Surface of your bridge should be flat. Use 2 steel supports off the bottom left starting point, one adjoining to the walk and one adjoining to the support structure underneath. THe support structure underneath should be an alternating triangle support system.