Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm almost ashamed of having built such a stupid deck as I have, but with the need to choose 75 cards, some 15 of which I'm quite sure I'll never be able to use, everything in need being strictly limited - what else could I do?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
urak
Aug. 03, 2010
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is AMAZING! Great graphics! Amazing detail. Great story. 5/5 I will admit I had to use the walk through to get my last ball even though on the life planet even though I had walked around it a billion times. Anyone who likes these types of games this is a MUST play! Thanks for such a great game!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yes, make it so when the opponent leaves, it counts as a win towards you. But make it so it only counts as a win if the game have lasted 5 mins or more. Or else people would get their friend to challenge them all the time, then just leave.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This must be a bad joke.. the original idea for this game is by 3DO. Its name was Arcomage and was included in the Might and Magic series from MM7 to MM9 and already published as a standalone game because of its success.
This version is a really bad joke compared to the beauty of Arcomage..
Thumbs down.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The computer player has refused to play when losing badly three times on me now. When you play and play and play and then overcome the difficult start and then are enjoying a massive advantage and an imminent victory, it's a real kick in the nuts to have the computer freeze up. Is the developer a sadist?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Rank should be based on a rating system like chess. If you have 100 wins and you're playing against Guest_1234 with 0 wins, you'd get 0 points if you win. While they would get much more for a win. Rate up so devs can see.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The sacrifice (unit) card can work against the computer themselves funnily when you don't have any workers yourself, they get rid of one of their workers but can't take one of yours because you don't have any.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Computer seemed unable to play another card when I was finally about to slaughter him on difficult, I know people quit when they're about to lose, but computers as well?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game is rather entertaining but its so luck orientated its awful. every turn is a gamble of either victory or defeat, either way its still entertaining. but i give it a 3 out of 5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have to say that after beating hard first without using any of the gold borders I feel like i've accomplished something. Then I read the achievement again and it reminds me its more of a test of patience than skill anyway. Should be an endurance badge :\
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
F***, I HATE THIS GAME. Easy and Medium were kinda fun, but hard is unbearable. Seriously, man, there's a difference between challenging and impossible. If there is a Castle Wars 3, I hope you fix this, 'cause this game has a lot of potential.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
On hard mode, got to the last castle on the first map(not sure if there's more..) and I for once was about to win, and now the bot won't take his god damn turn. What the eff is that all about...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hard mode isn't as hard as it first seems. Still some luck involved but you can counter that by restarting the hand until your initial cards are decent.
Build your deck with only resource and castle building cards. Strip out all attack and wall cards. Don't tackle hard until you have at 1-2 of the resource kill cards from completing the easy/medium levels.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I seem to constantly lag out in multiplayer. Is anyone else having this problem, or is it because of my crappy ISP? BTW, Qwest is worse than dial-up.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be nice if each map gave you a bonus in some way once you defeat it, for instance 1 defeated fort could give you a perminant +1 to starting mages, or +10 to starting crystals, etc. This would make the hard boss forts less luck based and give a feeling that conquering maps gave you some reward other than turning the map a different colour.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Way to much usage of bricks, looking at the supercards you need 35 Weapons, 45 Crystals and 75 Bricks to use every card once! try introducing cards which only need weapons + crystals so i dont end a match with ~100-150 weapons in my stash
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sure it sucks when your opponent quits when you're about to win, but A, half the people complaining probably do it, and B, it's great when the don't get out in time :p