Under rating threshold (hideshow)
We can only wonder how this game was badged and how it has that average rating, guess things are not what they used to be
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Despite the millions of comments complaining about the insane lag, the developer still continues to pin the blame on us and does absolutely nothing about it.
Obviously the developer doesn't care about the playerbase nor do they know how to code. My only regret is that I can't rate it 0, so 1/5 will have to suffice.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
After beating Level 4, the game started to glitch and I get to see a bunch of flashing crowns on each level icons.
Yeah, this dev really needs to learn how to optimize and stabilize.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Even if it was true that the game requires a powerful computer (which it isn't), why would you make a game for the general masses where that would even have to be the case regardless. C'mon. Boo.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
so on the 2nd level, due to the ridiculous lag issues i would either jump into a rock or fall into the water. I'm still very confused on why they haven't decided to fix what is clearly a major issue which is still pre-existing on there previous game. No doubt there has been a major amount of effort and work put into the game but it all seems a little bit pointless when you can't even play it.. 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
first of all: i love this game! is really wonderful and fun to play! i understand all the complaints here about the lag, but the game looks like a lot of work too and it looks like it is done with a lot of love. so if you can handle them, it would be really great. but a lot of comments here a really a little too harsh...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1/5 From SFK1, you got back: "Nice game, too bad of the horrible memory leakage, it makes it unplayable." In SFK2, I see no improvement, therefore I would like you to stop making games until you know how to deal with this, therefore a 1/5, to discourage you to make new games and encourage you to learn more to prevent memory leakage.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
On a scale of 1 through 10 for computing strength:
1.0) My desktop
1.5) Playing Crysis 3 or Arma 3 on full settings
2.0) Your desktop
2.5) Playing Crysis 3 and Arma 3 at the same time
3.0) NSA
4.0) Tianhe-2 supercomputer
5.0) Efficiently breaking the full AES encryption
[...]
10) 15 FPS on Strikeforce Kitty 2
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the new global standard.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm just checking the comments once in a while to see if lag is fixed. I'll only play after that. Take this seriously man. It's bad enough you launched this after countless complaints on the first one.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
for the masochists going for the hard badge, reload every couple of levels. Train stats equally until all chars are level 39 in each stat. Use Mortal Kombat artifact on Nighthawk to get Shao Khan Pupil. On final level use Aran, Bryce (Batman artifact on Batman), Maj, and SK Pupil. Once you have Clone, replace Bryce with Clone for +8 power. Hard badge will unlock after you play one more level after beating boss.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My last comment was over exaggerated. But i still think its weird that Kongregate has let this one slip trough without Kongregate or someone telling them to fix this issue before putting it on Kongregate and get badged.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Kongregate should put some minimum requirements before they let games be badged.
For instance, you should be able to play a game without a massive memory leak as this one.
Developer, cant you fix this? You're supposed to be a game developer. If its only your hobby i can sort of understand. But if game developing is your career, this is not a good way to create a solid reputation for Deqaf studio. When you dont follow up on big issues like this, you ruin your own and Deqaf company reputation.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Aggravating that you learned nothing from the first game, and didn't take any of the incredibly valuable feedback you received into account. 1/5, when you fix the game-breaking memory problems that have been around since the first game I will reconsider.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yeah it has nothing to do with computer power. I can start off the game and it plays fine for several minutes....then it slows down....then it slows more.....then it slows more....until it's basically standing still. A browser restart makes it run perfect. That's a memory leak.
It's actually not that bad before the lag starts. =/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How can this get released, much less badges when it has to be restarted every couple levels to get rid of the memory leak? Also I earned 100% on a level only to eventually figure out I hadn't yet collected all the clothing from it. I have no idea what any of the icons around the cloths mean. Why is it so hard to deal with the clothing??
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is one of the worst badge-ed games I have ever played here. It literally has every single possible glitch.
From the massive slowdown, to the almost constant crashing, to the worst flaw of all, it erases your game save around 60% of the time when it crashes your PC.
It is very madding to play a collection game like this, where you also have to grind a a lot, just to lose all of it and have to start over again to try and get the badges.
The sad thing is that if I do manage to ever earn the hard badge the game is so broken it probably will glitch too and I won't get the badge anyway.
My PC also runs Skyrim. Your game is just terrible. You have no excuse. This game is broken.
I only wish I cloud give it less than one star.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the "requires powerful computer" comment from dev is kind of a kick in the groin. lag that grows worse and worse is brutal.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Look, developer. I hate to be the 13,034,431st person to complain about this, but you NEED to optimize your game and patch memory leak problems. I don't have the best computer in the world, but I can still run triple-A games that are far more graphically demanding with better performance than this comparatively simple Flash game. Don't say I need a powerful computer for this because you're not really doing anything extraordinary with the graphics. As it stands now, the game runs so poorly that I don't even want to play it, even for badges.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
yeah this game is absolutely brutal in the lag department. the longer it runs the slower it gets, high or low graphic setting. had to actually close and re-open the browser numerous times
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wanted to rate the game 3/5 (-2 points due to lag). Instead, I'll rate it 1/5 because the dev rather blames ppl's PCs than fixing the memory leak in the game. Please refrain from publishing more games till you learned to code, dev.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How on earth do they give badges to a game that has such serious memory leaks that few people can play it through? There are plenty of other games to badge.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
need some more info for example what is energy and what is speed snd what make kitties move faster during combat(refil blue bar)?