Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is a simple little fantasy based strategy card game. Its fun for a few plays but then you notice that it is too easy, too chance based and too small to really have much replay value. A good first attempt, lets see a sequel with a little more substance.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Way too random. Everybody sees that as a cheap cure to making a challenging strategy game.... by throwing randomness in.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
really easy game but as it is allready said why get stats involved when its pure luck in the end but love the card game 4/10
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wtf
my 3 aliens, dragon, and reaper couldnt kill a freakin cursed rat?!?
i ended up having to take control of the rat in order to kill the freakin enemy
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
pretty cool.... requires WAY too much luck for my taste... my dragons and death knights and such get killed by rats and skeletons WAY too often
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm sure it's been repeated over and over again, but I want to throw this out there: It is impossible for any card game to not look like it was "half copied". All card games are now "half copied" because there are limited things you can do that are entirely unique. This is a great example of a simple CARD GAME, the fact that it resembles six or seven out there is inevitable because all six or seven resemble each other.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good idea, poor execution. Need a greater variability of cards, along with decreased importance of luck, currently theres very little strategy involved. Also, the way Yu-Gi-Oh is being half copied is weird. Either barrow more (especialy about game play) or move away from it. 1/5 (would be 3/5 w/o rng)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like how i can have a card with 11 attack against a card with 1 defense and roll a 0 3 times in a row. that pissed me off >.> Otherwise a good game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The problem is good to see when I explain something that happened to me exactly so:
I had 2 Hydras, a minotaur and a Dragon Knight against a ninja and a golem. I attacked. My Dragon Knight was killed by the ninja, The Hydras got serious damage at the golem after killing that ninja and my minotaur just failed a hit. After that, he called a rat. The Golem and the Rat killed my Hydras and A lightning zapped my minotaur. I only had one card in my hand left: Sacrifice. I had to pass and the computer won. So just because of the game's "strategic" value I got killed with ease when the odds were clearly on my side.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think this game is pretty good in the style, maybe you should add some dept with a tournament or something, a RPG like touch would add to the longivity.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Despite what idiots say about this game (and despite it's downfalls) Its a cool little game.
Its all about the right strategy boys. If y'all played magic or yugioh you'd know something about strategy, and how to beat this simple game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game totally sucks ass.
-52624585454638748496794367/5 pts.
I have NEVER seen such a stupid, fucked-up battle system that lets a Dragon Knight with a Fire Sword die against a rat cause it's entirely random.