Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Threes clone, with a 'corner strategy' really broken. Just right, up until stuck. Then left and repeat. At least give you an 512
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
First try - gets 1024;512 and 256 : NOOOOOOOOOO -- Second try - 2048 YEA I DID IT-wait,can I do 4096? and then I failed - this game is awesome though. I cant believe it turned out easy when you think of a good technique-but it was definitely worth my time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As FemmeFatale said, to win you should stay to a side. However, only following that doesn't get you to 2048. In addition to keeping the high numbers to one corner, keep the side you are "anchoring" continuously filled, with numbers in descending order. For example, in the bottom right corner, you might have 512, then above it 256, above that 64, and above that 32. Then it becomes much less risky to move up, allowing you to avoid tricky situations. You may also want to strategize the next three rows so that you can eventually fill in the smallest number on your "anchored" row, but this strategy gives you a much better chance of 2048 than pushing to one side alone.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
14244 first try. Only reason i kept going was because i didnt read the badge and thought i needed a 2048 tile. Only had a 1024 tile. This flash version is very disorienting since the tiles dont actually show movement, they just instantly appear in the direction you press.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Either I'm missing something or the game isn't working properly for me. I start with 2 tiles, but no new tiles ever spawn, even when I combine them.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Tried to beat the game with my brain, score: 738 - Tried to beat the game with random tapping, score: 3068 ... Hmmm...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Responsiveness of the controls seems to be poor compared to the official release. Spawn rate of 4's seems to be lower than it should be - I felt that it was much easier to get to 4096 in this version because I rarely saw 4s spawn, making it much easier to manage.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Keep your highest number in a corner, and never press the verticle opposite direction of it. e.g you're keeping your highest number in the top left, never press down, or vice versa.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
someone care to explain how in a game involving powers of 2, the top spot has a high score with an ODD number? this kinda crap is getting old
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Aiming for exactly 2048 (at any point in the game) could be a fun medium badge, loosing with exactly 2048, an almost impossible (?) badge. Nice game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game deserves more badges. Hard for the 2048 square and and impossible for the 4096 square (which isn't impossible, but it's difficult). If the game doesn't report squares, you can just go by score since the value of the squares are added together. 2048 happens around 20K and 4096 around 50K.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3613/zdmqwi7p_jpg.htm
First try.
It's less impressive once I tell you that this game has been my workday routine for almost 2 weeks now.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
After I figured out what I was doing this game was actually pretty fun. :D It's also rather relaxing and yet makes you think a bit.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well, I managed a good score first time playing on a different site. Played this got 1600. After getting tired after 2 more tries I just started pressing the keys in a set repeating pattern... I got 3960....
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok, this is stupid. I consistently get a better score by pressing random keys rather than thinking about it. Bad game is bad.