Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Manufactoria

« Back to Manufactoria

Scone

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I just noticed that the total parts statistic doesn't reflect the number of parts I actually used in the level. For level 1, it says I used 1 part when I had 3 conveyors. For level 2 it says I used 10 parts when I had 3 parts when I used 4 conveyors and 1 branch.

+ - !

(1)

Scone

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) A fantastic test of logic and looping skills with the added difficulty of not allowing wires to cross.

+ - !

(0)

dan_t

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Level Robospies: accept natural powers of 4. Zero is not natural, so value 1 should be rejected.

+ - !

(3)

rbuccigrossi

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Wonderful game! Congratulations on a challenging fun game that enticed me to stay up way too late.

+ - !

(0)

poofacedmonkey

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Its probably very good, but the tutorial doesn't seem to explain anything.

+ - !

(2)

anozir

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Nevermind, had to do a few edits.

+ - !

(0)

Kimhojung

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) So what is the purpose of this game?

+ - !

(0)

DrunkenJester

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Needs a much better tutorial. Even after fiddling around for a while I couldn't figure out what the hell was going on. Looks like it has potential though.

+ - !

(0)

LouWeed

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) JohnSteel is correct, there is a bug. This code should work for all input on Robolamp (level three) -- but it doesn't: ?lvl=3&code=p12:7f2;p12:6f2;c12:5f3;p12:8f2;c12:9f3; Awesome game anyways; don't sweat the (currently) 3.6 rating; all the best games (money seize, colourshift) have ratings between 3.5 and 4

+ - !

(-2)

anozir

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Is it just me or is Androids and Teachers! the same objective? I used the same machine. lol

+ - !

(0)

Mather

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) the tutorial dusent explain proply :(

+ - !

(-1)

voodooattack

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) God; my mind is melting, and I like it!

+ - !

(1)

Zebediah49

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) It took me roughly two rounds to fully understand how to use these things (IE how to make something approximating memory registers). After that, it was good fun :D

+ - !

(1)

wei00007

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Ibnstructions need some work, but besides that it was great : D I just couldnt get past the first level.

+ - !

(1)

jman10012

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) OMG this game is complecated.

+ - !

(-1)

Spreadeagle135

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Most sophisticated game I've ever seen on kongregate. I've taken some comsci classes and this is just like it. I love it. great concept.

+ - !

(1)

DubiousMerit

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) @Emulous: The strings of colors accompany the robots. Sometimes you have to output a specific pattern of dots, while other times you just evaluate the string and accept or reject based on it. The criterion is written in white at the lower left. For level 1, the criterion is to accept every robot that shows up - just make a conveyor from the round start to the square exit at the bottom. For level 2, the criterion is to accept a robot whose string starts with a blue. So you need to design a process that will read the first color on the tape. If it's blue, send it on to the exit. If it's red, dump it to the side. The actual tapes don't show up until you hit the triangle icon to test your device. You have to plan you systems on a series of "if, then" branches - if the dot is blue, I do one thing, if it is red I do something else, the net result being to send the proper ones to the exit, while rejecting the others.

+ - !

(0)

Emulous

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Where does it say what the output is supposed to be? Seriously what do I have to do to win. Can someone explain what I'm supposed to do. I know that I am supposed to send a robot to the end but whats with the strings. Poor documentation = 0.

+ - !

(1)

fizzle

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Great game. Alan Turing would be proud.

+ - !

(1)

gukinator

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) wait, disregard that i figured it out

+ - !

(0)

urmelhelble

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Would need an interactive tutorial.

+ - !

(0)

Kalirren

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Awesome game. Nice take on building a quasi-Turing machine.

+ - !

(0)

sylux16

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) this is confusing! i wish i had the patients to understand this! it would be cool!

+ - !

(0)

hammie170

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

gukinator

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) the game is still sort of fun, regardless of impossiblilities, ill give it a 3/5, maybe 4

+ - !

(-1)

gukinator

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-7)

HoopleDoople

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) A fantastic game with two minor flaws. 1) Insufficient explanation of game mechanics. Took a few missions of hands on testing before I fully understood the tools available (e.g. that you can cross conveyors). This shouldn't be that hard to fix. 2) The levels can get extremely difficult, such that one might have no clue how to even approach it. Including a way to access a hint for each level would be appreciated.

+ - !

(2)

Lazarenth

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I am a junior software engineering student at Milwaukee School of Engineering. When I played the first 3 levels I thought this would be another dumb "programming" flash game. It is actually very good and making MY head hurt! Good job!

+ - !

(2)

lwoodbur

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) ok, I write computer programs with extensive loops daily, and this game is crazy. Kudos to the guys who made this

+ - !

(1)

loveair2

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Ok i think i will be the first to post a comment to actually help people. the two first are really easy and then lava will be impossible if you havent understand this. The game ask you to accept if 3 blue balls are in the string otherwise reject. Think in 3 step. Step 1 is the first value blue? if yes process to step 2 otherwise reprocess. eliminate if no color. Step 2 is value blue? if yes process to step 3. otherwise reprocess in this same stage untill blue value . if no more value reject. Step 3 is this value blue? if yes put in the final box if no reprocess in this same stage untill blue value comes out. if no more value eliminate.

+ - !

(2)

Draconias

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) To novakaine (and anyone else complaining about trial and error), I'm fairly certain that you generally don't need to know what dots are going to show up. Technically your design should work for ANY combination of dots.

+ - !

(1)

Kashlavor

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) The logic is perfect, if your design doesn't work you didn't do it right. Example for that lava lamp thing, remeber it didnt say three "in a row", just three total. Basically this game is meant for people who really, really, know logic; otherwise just give up.

+ - !

(3)

JohnSteel

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-14)

camo5

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) very well constructed game. im not one for puzzles, but this one kept me interested. like applepiepod said, it takes logical thinking to beat it. i got about halfway through before i was pressed for time on other matters (HW)

+ - !

(2)

StainofAH

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-15)

BifernGTW

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I'm a system engineer and I found this game is very good for those who want to become a computer or software engineer because you must think logically. @Novakaine, each level has a condition to accept or reject the robot eg. "Accept a robot that end with red dot". This is the point why this game doesn't show all input. If your conveyors are built correctly, it must be able to handle all input whatever they are.

+ - !

(22)

applepiepod

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-18)

piezor

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Looks promising, but not really my cup of tea. 3/5.

+ - !

(-1)

Juliuz01

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-15)

vadersdemise_93

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-17)

vicktor0

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Wow. This is among the most difficult games I have ever played. And yet, I cant stop playing... 4/5, woulda been a 5/5 but its so damn difficult. The hardest level I've beaten so far is Roboplanes.

+ - !

(0)

21thcen

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) i got 5 lvls down and after that nothing :-( still i rate 5/5 cause im not afraid of a challenge

+ - !

(-1)

kingddd

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Debugging robocat sucked...

+ - !

(2)

Im_A_Mod_Person

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-15)

Belarkernous

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) This game rocks almost completed every level needs more levels.

+ - !

(0)

DubiousMerit

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) @Thecakeisnotalie: For level 3 (Robolamp), the piece has to go through three blue arrows to ensure you have at least three blue dots. Use three red/blue switches in series so that the blue goes to the next one and the reds just get burned off. The third blue arrow heads for the exit. Solution:?lvl=3&code=c12:5f3;p12:6f2;p12:8f4;c12:7f3;c12:9f2;p13:9f2;c13:8f3;c13:10f0;

+ - !

(-2)

chanceman60001

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-20)

supergui

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-27)

Thecakeisnotalie

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I like this game, but the instructions are terrible. Normally I'm good at this kind of thing, but I don't understand this at all. I'm stuck on the third level. I don't even know why I'm losing... >.<

+ - !

(1)

xelepart

May. 20, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) More improvements to 28/robomecha (le0nett0 and ReynFox) - 2 less parts, faster on (most) inputs: ?lvl=28&code=g12:3f3;p12:5f3;c12:4f3;q11:5f1;b11:4f2;r13:4f0;q13:5f5;g14:5f3;r14:6f0;g10:5f3;b10:6f2;c11:6f2;c13:6f0;c12:6f3;p12:7f3;r13:7f0;b11:7f2;q12:8f6;c12:9f3;c12:10f3;c12:11f3;

+ - !

(-2)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Code of Conduct
© 2026 Kongregate