Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Zorts, it really isn't fair to downrate a logic game like this because the language barrier prevents you from doing well.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I liked it. 4/5, cause it's good at what it is. Only thing I'd say is it would be cool if you could come up with something to randomly generate a solution and clues. Give it "re-playability".
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I am not so good at english so this game is unplayable like :
Green house is next to and left of white house.What i understand it is impossible,it cant be next when its left side...
So i have to rate this 1/5.i have solved this in my own language it was a bit different but its generally old puzzle.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Its a fun riddle, but Im not gonna give it a good score cause all you really did was make the layout to it, and that was pretty average. simple to use but which is good, though Im sure it makes the whole riddle easier when you have such an easy layout
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Used a spreadsheet to keep track of what was connected to what, and what hints I used.. I didn't realize you could click on the hints to grey them out.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The interface is nice, you can move cards that have some relation together (i.e. you can place them anywhere you want). It could use a bit more polish, and randomly generated puzzles would be nice (but of course require more effort to do and get right). Maybe a set of 30 non-random levels? And something a bit more graphical?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great example of a logic puzzle in flash. The organization was acceptable but a note taking area might have been nice (I did all my notes placing elements next to each other though). For people commenting on the lack of the standard table set up, I do not believe this type of puzzle would have benefited much as the crux of the logic came down to a more advanced deductive path then that type of table could have illustrated. You are left with several associations that have either two or three possible placements, but only one combination of those associations which is possible. The standard table can't illustrate this.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
needs a much better note system... 3/5 with that and random generator to replay you can get some nice scores and maybe some $$$
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Adding color to the categories makes organizing better, but could still use more room (or smaller items).
I enjoyed the puzzle.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sloppy job with the interface (nowhere to take notes, not enough room to keep things organized). Since all the game offers over a piece of paper is the interface, I don't see how this deserves more than a 1/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
fun puzzle, really sloppy and unorganized set-up. should have levels leading up to this puzzle for ppl. Finished on first try :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
try to do this in tables (i done about seven) like this:
x z y w
A + - - -
B - - - +
C - - + -
D - + - +
i don't know how to explain this more
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i love these kinds of puzzles but the format this game presents it in is terrible. you can find good examples of how to do this in flash with a couple seconds of google (look up "logic problems") so 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't know why people are giving such a high score. Basically, you are rewarding someone's laziness: sure they made a simple flash 'game' to solve a one hundred year old logic puzzle, but is it worth awarding him the weekly prize when there are better games this week?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Solution's posted everywhere, not hard to find. No I didn't use it since I had already seen this puzzle multiple times. Seriously think this is an overrated game atm. 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
don't listen to sir tokes. if you have 25/25 once you have pressed finish (it comes up in a yellow box) then you have got it correct. @ Thervold: it can be either side, but you can work out which one is correct using logic ;D