Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game is nice, but it requires real money to be enjoyed at its best. Hope it will be in some way "fixed" in the near future by the devs.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love this game. I'm F2P and I'm ranking up just fine. You do need to have some issuance though. That said, I absolutely agree that the prices for everything are insane. What's rule the top,ybut the devs could at least throw us F2P guys a bone one in a while.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What the heck? Oh boy, another game that you practically need money for to get by, and not only that, but now packs only give you one card. Why would you ever put in a cap for how many cards I can have!? And the prices for getting cards is absolutely outrageous!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really enjoy WMT, and enjoyed TU the first bit I played. Then I realized that if I don't put money into this game, I'm not going to get very far/do well at all. It's really disappointing, I see so much potential in this game. But no one likes pay to win games, and this one is so blatantly that way :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It isn't a smart move to make an highly pay2win version of a previous game when you're competing with games like War of Omens which is not pay2win and is vastly more intricate and developed.
Marketing works the other way around: when competition offers better for less, you must produce even better for even less or at least the same.
You failed to basic economics, and even managed to offend your own fanbase in the process by milking money off them.
You'd better off getting more skill and less money hunger.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
BoboCop, there is a way to silence the music and sound. Go to your deck screen, and there should be a musical note and speaker buttons. Click those, and you'll be able to mute all sounds.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Agreeing with the other posts. Game is fun but a definite cash grab. Being competitve on a higher level without throwing money in (read: being competitive at all) will demand (high) money investments.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lots of fun to play, but an endless grind for upgrades and heavy handed pay-to-win strategies. As I've played for around 8 months though, I still say it's a great game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
To anyone wondering why this game has 4 stars, haters may be loud but the supporters are here playing. You don't need to pay to get somewhere. You just need time. The time itself that you spend here is support and contribution to the developers. If you hate it because people use money, don't play. There are players who enjoy this game plus it has good details and is updated frequently. If you prefer WMT, go there. If you want to buy but suddenly do not because of the prices, think. Are you buying to just win or also to support the developers? Not everyone has big money like the others. It's your choice on how you spend your money. If you don't want to buy, then don't. If you think this is not worth your time, then don't play it. I cannot do anything about your disappointment so downvote me if you want.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How does this have a 4 star rating.... Every comment i've read is people that hate it, me being one... The first tyrant was dull, this is even worse, plus the fact that the outrageous prices you need to pay just to be considered "average"... Awful. this should get 0/5 stars
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
One has to wonder how many millions of alternate accounts and/or how much bribery went into making this game have 4 stars.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
completely disagree with kotasirith, unlike the FIRST which you could play free with option on paying, with decent end results, THIS is utter and total garbage ... you have absolutely no chances to do anything unless you pay pay pay pay pay and pay some more from day one. Ill just play something else, bye bye. Rated 1 because cant rate 0 with it showing anywhere.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Not only is there the much hated energy system, but it is also clearly another pay to win game. The only cards you can get without spending in-game money are most definitely commons that can't really do you much good. This unfortunatly lives up to being as bad about this as th first one, not much creativity and takes your money. 2/10
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Tis more fun running the game without spending your real world cash, although the developers do deserve something for their troubles:)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Been playing for over 6 months. Fun game, takes a lonnng time to get a competitive deck if you don't spend money though.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@md524 True. The game itself has big flaws, but some improvement over the old Tyrant. But hey, i can't even speak freely, since a proper analys instantly get downvoted.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@md524 It seems, since i've done 3 comments for this game, 2 fully negative, and one with some positive points. Both negatives got well rated, the (a bit more) positive one got severly downvoted.