Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1. Energy Cost to Maximum Energy ratio is too high
2. a. We can't do much worthwhile with gold, high reliance on WB/$$$
b. 'War Bonds' Cost almost as much as actual War Bonds
3. I wouldn't mind a time-stamp on the Guild Chat
4. It's too addicting! Could you maybe make it less fun, so that I can spend more time pretending to do productive things instead?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Be careful about cheating. It seems that Devs FINALLY decided to punish bots and account sharing. Unless you spend money in this game, then you can literally brag about it in the forums, Devs will just delete your posts so the ignorants can keep thinking everything is fair and just.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the game, different from other CCG. But there should be a FAQ within the game in order to avoid confusion. I signed up and did not receive the 25 war bonds, sad :-(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@flameroran77 well. thats because you dont have a good enough deck. just make a dune runner and that just slaughters.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lead your Faction to Victory! Build your deck, upgrade your cards and battle thousands of players online!
Conquer Acheron in this this FREE* STRATEGY GAME!
*Ability to win against idiots that shelled out cash for this BS not included.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the basic packs should give more than one card, and there should be different types of packs that costs more gold than the basic packs, but it should give better -and more rare- cards.Also, the energy cost for all of the missions should be halved.like if you agree.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hektikbeatz,you better hope the developers don't see your comment,'cause that could give them more ideas and reasons...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Usually any type of games improve when the developers of these games listen to the suggestions made by majority of the players. When developers created another game that's similar to another game that they created before, it's usually a better one, because they know what the players wanted out of the games in terms of the difficulty, options, graphics, etc. Now on Tyrant Unleashed, because it's still a p2w, I'm starting to see this almost as identical to WMT as opposed to graphics and the playout. Now devs of TU, if you could spend some time to think of reading our comments, I hope you understand how the players would feel about this. How would you feel if you play another p2w game that's JUST LIKE this game? You can vote me down as much as you want, but games like this will most likely never improve with hard-headed devs.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
why cant we move card window like in old tyrant? its right in middle of cards i want to know about, but i cant click them because of it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@KillerNature11 You can click on the arrow at the right to find weaker opponents. But remember BR doesn't mean much, its not a proper evaluation of the player's deck and you have the advantage of being the first to drop a card, so you can easily beat higher BR people than you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You pay 50 gold to get someone close to your BR, and get fked 8 times out of 10. Is this a scam? I want to fight people my level...fking let me do it!!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
could we plz get some more energy for gold instead of having to pay so much wbs? even a high gold price would be fine
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
why is this game so broken? for example, when someone awakens your card it cannot berseck, and i just just lost a card because of 'valor' i had less atack than the enemy, i dont understand why it thit active...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If I have to do about 5 missions to get 1 random and crappy card, then you may as well give us 4 cards since you need so much dam SP. +1 if you agree.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there are like 10 people who have to go through the comments and dislike them all XD there are constantly things under the rating threshold that by all means shouldnt be... im on to you dinkleberg