Under rating threshold (hideshow)
AWSOME GAME! love the graphics, gameplay, and the great way u fused a rpg and tower defense game into one! keep up the good work.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Definitely takes more planning and strategy than the last one-- more than just picking the right tech points. I've had a lot of luck remembering that in this version, the swordsmen do more than just physical damage.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is just a little too hard. I love love LOVE the system, but as someone who beat the first one with a hardy and fun struggle, I should not be stuck after beating 5 levels.
Great game though, and I like how the skills system changes for each one.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The Game is too hard on normal. Also if you wanted to make the first lvl up to select a element you should be able to do it instantly. Some times your end mages dont even lvl and end up producing no help on harder mobs.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
One of my favourite one's
But a bit too hard :(
Dont wanna play on Coward difficulty anyway....
Only for maps left ;)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game requires you to almost plan ahead and redistributing your points everytime, something very annoying for a defence game. 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree about the frogs in the mines. I tried hitting them with Cripple (the one effect not immune to) and nothing happens because their armour is too high. Oh, and extra lives does naff all as there are too many
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game is really cool, but unfortunately the programmer abuses his own system. Working with elements, immunities, experience and other game aspects is really cool. But somehow the creator of this game forces the player to play EXACTLY the way he wants. In almost every level there is only one strategy that really works and it always requires a lot of calculating, redistribution of skill points and trial and error. I can't image that other people like to play a game this way. Strategy games should be about common sense and smart thinking, not about painfully restricted possibilities and a very predestined way to play.. 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
be 'designed byt the programmer' i mean a game of math. the number crunching here is what makes types effective, which is great for the programmer! crappy for the casual gamer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game suffers from 'programmer syndrome'. it's designed by a programmer and the system is not intuitive. before you have elemtns and mages which did clearly specific things. by homogenizing all classes it's hard to keep track of who's doing one, making it not only unintuitive, but a game of memory which I believe tower defence games should be neither.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
WTF when i play fallen mine i easily get the hellfrog down to 1 health and then they just dont die no matter what i try. i think it might be bugged.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hmmmmmmmmmmm no challenge so easy maps and mini bosses etc... adjust difficulty please... thanks
-keen_jah@yahoo.com-
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Walaho: this game is ballanced and harder them the first one. Its about strategy and nothing else so dont say it is unballanced
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Toan133 Besides firefox spell checker, I also used microsoft works as a spellchecker. beserk doesn't exist at all, and armour is correct, but when using the dictionary, it just referred me to armor...which means armor is the primary spelling. I wouldn't make such a big deal out of it, but since it specifically insists that armour is correct, I had to say something. Besides that, there's another flaw with protectopedia, and that's the destructor description. If you read that, you'll see that inflictor shows up in there. At the same time, if you read inflictor, inflictor shows up there too...so what's inflictor again?
Btw, anybody got a John Rico mage?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@MikesHood: Dude Internet browser spell-checks are awful. Berserk and beserk are I believe both words, and armor can be spelled with or without a u.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Protectopedia is flawed. It mentions that both beserk and berserk are correct, when beserk is actually wrong. It also says armor has a u in it. That's also incorrect. I'm using firefox right now, and I'm getting a red line below armour, but not armor. So, yeah, armor is the correct spelling, there is no u. This wouldn't be a big deal under normal circumstances, but since it outright says it, that makes all the difference.