|
|
metadata
Caravaneer seems to have a rating of 4.5 with 2547 votes ([http://kongregate.com/games/SugarFreeGames/caravaneer](http://kongregate.com/games/SugarFreeGames/caravaneer))
SugarFreeGames didn’t get the legendary game bonus ([http://kongregate.com/accounts/SugarFreeGames/rewards](http://kongregate.com/accounts/SugarFreeGames/rewards))
Is there an error in the code? Or do you actually need more than twenty five hundred votes (!) in order to get the bonus (that caravaneer definitely deserves)
|
|
|
metadata
Well I see a rating of 4.05, not 4.5…
|
|
|
metadata
The “Legendary Game” bonus is awarded when a game gets an average of 4 or more when it has 500 ratings, so it’s safe to say that it’s average rating was lower than 4 when it got 500 ratings.
|
|
|
metadata
> The “Legendary Game” bonus is awarded when a game gets an average of 4 or more when it has 500 ratings, so it’s safe to say that it’s average rating was lower than 4 when it got 500 ratings.
No, it’s supposed to check it the other way around. When a game has a rating of 4, then it’s supposed to check if it has at least 500 ratings. Seems more fair that way.
This seems to be a bug, and we’ll look into it.
|
|
|
metadata
Is there any news on this?
I looked at the faq, and it does seem to suggest that a game needs to be highly rated as it passes the rating level, as Hitaro described. Perhaps the programmer worked from that?
So if you change it, perhaps you could change the faq too?
|
 "Ratatosk"){kind=avatar}
 "Malachi"){kind=small}
 "Hitaro"){kind=icon}
 "greg"){kind=small}
 "Lysis"){kind=small}