|
|
metadata
**New missions with gold/energy/rep per point of energy:**
[http://warmetal.wikia.com/wiki/Tyrant\_Missions#Tables\_.28External.29](http://warmetal.wikia.com/wiki/Tyrant_Missions#Tables_.28External.29)
As you see, mission 99 is the best to farm gold but not for EXP and the side-mission Bloody Raiders 4 is the most balanced to farm exp + gold with a good winrate.
**Best decks for mission 99:**
Freddie + 10 Trident = 99,97% winrate
Freddie + 10 Irradiated Infantry = 98,34% winrate
* * *
**Best decks for side-missions BR4, VR4 and IP4:**
[http://www.kongregate.com/forums/65-tyrant/topics/212331-best-deck-for-1-9-10-side-mission](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/65-tyrant/topics/212331-best-deck-for-1-9-10-side-mission)
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Dracorex, 9x Azure Reaper, and Stealthy Niaq is better; Freddie + 10x Trident is better still.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
So, for those wondering (and if netrats current sim is accurate)
Mission 99 → 16.07 × .9834 = 15.80 gain after failure.
As compared to
CF4 → 14.52 x ~.995 = 14.45 gain after failure.
Looks like we have a a new winnah at a significantly cheaper price point!
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[TheTrio](/forums/65/topics/209048?page=1#posts-4520830):***
>
> Dracorex, 9x Azure Reaper, and Stealthy Niaq is better; Freddie + 10x Trident is better still.
Thank you! Freddie and 10 Tridents have an incredible good winrate.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Has anyone tried Atlas/Thadius/Hydraulis yet?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Mission 119 looks more promising in gold/exp ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Without Heals, Trident is only active for 2 turns, max
Nonetheless, I’ll go test it.
* * *
**Edit (Only using 10k games, Commander + 10 Tridents):**
0 Wins – Dracorex (0%)
20 Wins – Atlas (0.2%)
92 Wins – Thadius (092%)
3160 Wins – Hydraulis (31.6%)
9872 Wins – Eva (98.72%)
9998 Wins – Freddie (99.98%)
* * *
With 1 Million Tests
**Freddie, 10 Tridents: 999,842 Wins = 99.98%**
Freddie, 9 Tridents: 999,785 Wins = 99.98%
Freddie, 8 Tridents: 999,639 Wins = 99.96%
Freddie, 7 Tridents: 999,262 Wins = 99.93%
Freddie, 6 Tridents: 998,081 Wins = 99.81%
Freddie, 5 Trident, Exodrone, 4 II: 997,603 Wins = 99.76%
Freddie, 5 Trident, Exodrone, 3 II, Tiamat: 997,501 Wins = 99.75% (Tiamat is worse than II)
Freddie, 5 Trident, Exodrone, 3 II, Bazooka Marine: 997,473 Wins = 99.75% (Bazook is worse than II)
Freddie, 5 Trident, Exodrone: 995,688 Wins = 99.57%
Freddie, 5 Tridents: 993,133 Wins = 99.31%
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[lolizard](/forums/65/topics/209048?page=1#posts-4521054):***
>
> Is 99 really the best to farm gold on? I thought the best would be more closer to mission 119.
Um. Look at the chart? Lol.
By the way, for the cheap version:
**98.62% Freddie, Nimbus, 9x Irradiated Infantry, Bazooka Marine**
98.51% Freddie, 8x Irradiated Infantry, 2x Bazooka Marine
Testing other stuff now. From doing some tests in various scenarios, Protect seems to be functioning correctly (note that the devs just now changed the Protect+Counter mechanic, but that doesn’t affect this mission. But what I’m not sure about – did NETRAT say whether Supply and Tribute are functional? I haven’t looked into those.)
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
I think the simulator is buggy. It says Freddie + 9x Trident gets a win rate of above 99%, but add a Sabre and it drops to below 2%. Given that the enemy has no Mimic and that Sabre will be played last 1/10 of the time, we would expect a win rate of at least 9% no matter how bad Sabre is.
If you still trust the simulator enough, Dementia + 10x Brawler does well for those who have done Tourneys but are neither in Factions nor have done Raids.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[TheTrio](/forums/65/topics/209048?page=1#posts-4521114):***
>
> I think the simulator is buggy. It says Freddie + 9x Trident gets a win rate of above 99%, but add a Sabre and it drops to below 2%. Given that the enemy has no Mimic and that Sabre will be played last 1/10 of the time, we would expect a win rate of at least 9% no matter how bad Sabre is.
>
> If you still trust the simulator enough, Dementia + 10x Brawler does well for those who are neither in Factions nor have done Raids.
Adding a sabre still gives ~99.9% for me. So… I think you messed up somewhere.
99.10% Dementia, 10x Brawler
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
(Freddie is listed first in the “Minimalistic” tab, I don’t know why Sabre is first in the “Evaluate” results. Version 1.0.7.24.)
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[TheTrio](/forums/65/topics/209048?page=1#posts-4521168):***
>
> 
>
> (Freddie is listed first in the “Minimalistic” tab, I don’t know why Sabre is first in the “Evaluate” results. Version 1.0.7.24.)
Thanks, Im going to report this bug.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Must be a bug where it plays the commander as one of the cards, I would guess (so it might even be “played” last). Try using Visual instead.
Edit: Also:
**99.56% Vyander, 10x Dominated Hatchlings**
(w/ Apex: 99.55%. w/ Niaq: 99.53%. w/ Xanadu: 99.51%)
Sidenote (impractical, just out of curiosity): It’s improved by Beetle Bombers, up to 99.95% with Vyander, 9x Beetle Bomber, Xanadu.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
I am trying to optimize the Freddie + 10 Trident Deck.
* * *
Base Deck
**Freddie, 10 Tridents: 99.98%** (999,842 Wins / 1M)
* * *
**Commander Test (Only using 10k games, Commander + 10 Tridents):**
0 Wins – Dracorex (0%)
20 Wins – Atlas (0.2%)
92 Wins – Thadius (092%)
3160 Wins – Hydraulis (31.6%)
9872 Wins – Eva (98.72%)
9998 Wins – Freddie (99.98%)
* * *
Freddie + Trident Variants (1M trials)
**Freddie, 10 Tridents: 999,842 Wins = 99.98%**
Freddie, 9 Tridents: 999,785 Wins = 99.98%
Freddie, 8 Tridents: 999,639 Wins = 99.96%
Freddie, 7 Tridents: 999,262 Wins = 99.93%
Freddie, 6 Tridents: 998,081 Wins = 99.81%
Freddie, 5 Tridents: 993,133 Wins = 99.31%
* * *
Tell me Decklists to Test and I’ll Update the results.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
The difference is extraordinarily small (I really, really don’t feel like doing enough trials to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference), but T-46 Leonidas appears to POSSIBLY offer a tiny, tiny improvement. But I would suggest not including it in the suggested deck so people don’t rage :p
Here is my data; 11 million trials with each deck.
The difference is less than the standard dev, so.. take that for what you will.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
So Freddie / 6 trident is at 99.81%… Does filling out the deck from there with II improve the winrate or is it better to leave the slots blank?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Blank
Edit: slight improvements over a 6x Trident deck (possibly more to come)
This may not be that helpful since Hellion costs more than Trident, and most people aren’t likely to have bought more than one.
These are ranked in order even though I didn’t list beyond the second decimal.
99.96% Freddie, 6x Trident, 2x Hellion, T-46 Leonidas
99.96% Freddie, 6x Trident, 4x Hellion
99.96% Freddie, 6x Trident, 3x Hellion
99.94% Freddie, 6x Trident, 2x Hellion
99.91% Freddie, 6x Trident, Hellion
99.81% Freddie, 6x Trident
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[technoshaman](/forums/65/topics/209048?page=1#posts-4522354):***
>
> So Freddie / 6 trident is at 99.81%… Does filling out the deck from there with II improve the winrate or is it better to leave the slots blank?
#### Freddie + 6 Tridents have a 99.81% win rate.
### Freddie + 6 Tridents + […]
**worse**
[Aegis] 98.44%
[Helios] 99.57%
[Sabre] 99.58%
[Arc Trooper] 99.71%
[Centurion] 99.71%
[Nimbus] 99.77%
[Irradiated Infantry] 99.78%
[Titan] 99.78%
[Dominator] 99.79%
[Tiamat] 99.79%
[Sharpshooter] 99.81% (marginally worse than a blank spot)
**same**
[_nothing, just 6 Tridents_] 99.81%
**better**
[Lance Rider] 99.82% (not much better, and … probably less than 5 people currently have this)
[Exodrone] 99.85%
[Metalhead] 99.86%
[Fortifier] 99.87%
[Hellion] 99.90%
[Trident #7] 99.93%
[T-46 Leonidas] 99.94%
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
## Summary
**To make this deck:**
1) Choose Freddie.
2) Add Assault Cards until your deck is full or you get to step 3.
- Add T-46 Leonidas if you ~~have it~~ are from the U.S.
- Add as many Tridents as you have.
- Add Hellions, if you have any.
- Add Fortifier.
- Add Metalheads, if you have any.
- Add Exodrone.
- Add Lance Riders, if you have any, heh!
3a) At this point, if your deck is decent size (~6-7 cards+), you are finished.
3b) If your deck is small (\< 6-7 cards), go to step 4.
* * *
4) (Optional, only recommended if you have a small deck) Add from the following list till you have a decent size deck (~6-7 cards+) — too small of a deck gets flanked):
- Add Sharpshooters.
- Add Tiamat.
- Add Titan.
- Add Irradiated Infantries.
- Add Nimbus.
5) If you want to have results for specific decks, you could try to [test it yourself](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/65-tyrant/topics/195043-evaluate-decks-game-simulator) .
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Is there a deck to farm 119 yet?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
There are several options for 119, Zaraki. I haven’t worked on non-WB options yet, but my current incarnation with cards I actually have is:
99.84% Dracorex, Valefar, 2x Beetle Bomber, 5x Vigil, 2x Xeno Interceptor
And of course, Interceptors are awesome (the one time I ever wished for more than the two I have)
99.88% Dracorex, 10x Xeno Interceptor
I have some more I’ll be adding in a bit (working on non-WB options).
Edit: Regarding Dominator – It performs rather poorly. It has pierce, but just doesn’t do enough damage (only two Flying assaults on M119).
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Thanks for the post Tafkam :) I also lack xeno interceptors(have one). Are dominators recommended?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[zaraki](/forums/65/topics/209048?page=1#posts-4526773):***
>
> Thanks for the post Tafkam :) I also lack xeno interceptors(have one). Are dominators recommended?
Fortifier is Recommended. Probably over Xeno Interceptor.
Havoc is a good choice.
Micromech works fine too.
|
 "DarkBlood1"){kind=small}
 "TheTrio"){kind=small}
 "technoshaman"){kind=small}
 "EvilSplinter"){kind=small}
 "lolizard"){kind=small}
 "loki3"){kind=small}
 "Tafkam"){kind=small}
 "Elephantum"){kind=small}
 "Golden119"){kind=small}
 "zaraki"){kind=small}