Forums Zening

sKILL point proposal

Subscribe to sKILL point proposal 9 posts

Sign in to reply


 
avatar for Willardlard Willardlard 2 posts
Flag Post

Since the latest update I have found it nearly impossible to defeat players with whom I used to be competitive. The simple reason is that I have always favored army games, and everyone else decided to focus on hero matches once sKILL points were introduced. So even though I have an army at level 41 and used to win about 75% of my 1v1 hero games, my hero is no longer a match for people who devoted hours to farming low level players just to upgrade their hero.

There is little long-term benefit to playing army games anymore, so few people will. A simple solution would be to award sKILL points for army matches. I propose 1 sKILL point per kill in these games. While winning a 1v1 army game would thus yield more than winning a 1v1 hero, it is merited due to the fact that such a game takes more time, and requires more skill.

Another good change would be to vary the number of sKILL points awarded based upon how many the slain target has acquired. This would discourage noob farming and reward the occasional victory over a powerful foe. Perhaps 1 sKILL point per 1000 that the target has amassed would work well (1 sKILL point for 0-999, 2 sKILL points for 1000-1999, etc.).

The current format richly rewards people who spend tons of time on the site rather than people who actually play well but do so only occasionally. There is a problem of scaring off new players, I think the risk of alienating long-time players is just as great. If no change is made then the game will lose players and languish once again.

 
avatar for phyrexian phyrexian 55 posts
Flag Post

For your concern on the value of army being less than acceptable. An upcomming chane should hopefully add prestige to army once again. It’d be a ranking system, same as chess uses.

Anyone feel like finding the formula they use exactly? and then posting it? I ahve a starting palce. —> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system

Hero does reward players who play more. Upcomming changes to army should reward players who play army well. Time spent is usually a good thing to reward on multiplayer games. But army will be there for those who enjoy balanced tactics.

 
avatar for celldotn celldotn 27 posts
Flag Post

phy I don’t think he wants an upgrade system for army, more that he wants people to be able to play army without having to let their hero fall behind.

 
avatar for phyrexian phyrexian 55 posts
Flag Post
Originally posted by celldotn:

phy I don’t think he wants an upgrade system for army, more that he wants people to be able to play army without having to let their hero fall behind.

That’s an interesting idea. I’ll mention it and keep it in mind.

 
avatar for Willardlard Willardlard 2 posts
Flag Post

That is indeed my idea. Armies should never be upgradeable, but winning at army should allow you to boost your hero. As it currently stands, any time I spend playing army is time that my hero is falling behind everyone else’s.

 
avatar for yourmomdad yourmomdad 6995 posts
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
avatar for yourmomdad yourmomdad 6995 posts
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
avatar for yourmomdad yourmomdad 6995 posts
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
avatar for Jaerid Jaerid 58 posts
Flag Post

Erm , this points system will make it harder for players to play and win , he wants to keep the simple and easy game to play and win .

Sign in to reply