Whats considered a low rank? page 2

42 posts

Flag Post
Originally posted by FDX3:

Just about every response here is very inaccurate.

Originally posted by slatonw:

50 and lower is low. Lock thread. :D


This is the most accurate.
Originally posted by animebubble:

I’d consider anything under rank 25 a low rank.


And to confirm, anyone who is rank 50+ has actually cheated to get there. It is impossible to have reached that rank at this time by simply racing/simming.


That’s completely incorrect. It is far from impossible, and it’s been done. Keep in mind you’re rank 37. You should stop copying everything ax6 says and post in the threads where you have accurate knowledge.

This is a thread of opinion, not facts.

OP:

Originally posted by Kyuubi879:

Well, everyone has different opinions about what a “low rank” is.

So no one is incorrect.

 
Flag Post

I’m referring to her second paragraph, obviously. Not sure what you’re thinking.

 
Flag Post

“Just about every response here is inaccurate.”

 
Flag Post

I believe anything below the rank of 30 low.

 
Flag Post

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Glued:

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

So rank 0 is the highest rank you have to be to be a low rank?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Speedster879:
Originally posted by Glued:

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

So rank 0 is the highest rank you have to be to be a low rank?

No, I think that ranks 20 and under are..

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Glued:
Originally posted by Speedster879:
Originally posted by Glued:

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

So rank 0 is the highest rank you have to be to be a low rank?

No, I think that ranks 20 and under are..

As long as you’re not calling a rank 1 a pro.

 
Flag Post

So what im getting is most people think around ranks 20-30 or under is low. Some 15-20 and if rank 40 was a low rank… thats just ridiculous. if you thought rank 40 was a low rank then you must be like 50 >.> but… 40 to me does not fit the common sense of “low rank” :/ its just not right.

 
Flag Post

below 25

 
Flag Post

I think that like 35 and lower is a low rank now because it’s so easy to get rank ups. I think that Jiggmin should make every maps earned xp and divide it by 2. Like bac in the day it was good to be a rank 25, but now it just doesn’t seem that way

 
Flag Post

back*

 
Flag Post

Way back in the day before the simming you know today, 15 was considered good i think.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by KingKyd:

The way I see it is

0-15 – New player
16-25 – New player that won’t just play one time
26-30 – New player that’s intrigued by the game
31-40 – Dedicated player
41-50 – Pro
50+ – Must have no life or have too much free time

Same goes with a scale of hats.

0-4 – New player, probably earned them through random luck
5-7 – Dedicated player
8-11 – Player that probably wants them all

uhm the hat 8-11 is just you are pro not you want them all. your just going to play and win them

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by larsyuipo:
Originally posted by KingKyd:

The way I see it is

0-15 – New player
16-25 – New player that won’t just play one time
26-30 – New player that’s intrigued by the game
31-40 – Dedicated player
41-50 – Pro
50+ – Must have no life or have too much free time

Same goes with a scale of hats.

0-4 – New player, probably earned them through random luck
5-7 – Dedicated player
8-11 – Player that probably wants them all

uhm the hat 8-11 is just you are pro not you want them all. your just going to play and win them

I do play to win them all. There are some hats that I find a bit useless in most situations. Big example is the Kong hat.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Speedster879:

Way back in the day before the simming you know today, 15 was considered good i think.

Way back in the day it took me a year to get rank 23. :D

 
Flag Post

I’m rank 35! yay