Whats considered a low rank? page 2

Originally posted by FDX3:

Just about every response here is very inaccurate.

Originally posted by slatonw:

50 and lower is low. Lock thread. :D

This is the most accurate.

Originally posted by animebubble:

I’d consider anything under rank 25 a low rank.

And to confirm, anyone who is rank 50+ has actually cheated to get there. It is impossible to have reached that rank at this time by simply racing/simming.

That’s completely incorrect. It is far from impossible, and it’s been done. Keep in mind you’re rank 37. You should stop copying everything ax6 says and post in the threads where you have accurate knowledge.

This is a thread of opinion, not facts.

OP:

Originally posted by Kyuubi879:

Well, everyone has different opinions about what a “low rank” is.

So no one is incorrect.

I’m referring to her second paragraph, obviously. Not sure what you’re thinking.

“Just about every response here is inaccurate.”

I believe anything below the rank of 30 low.

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

Originally posted by Glued:

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

So rank 0 is the highest rank you have to be to be a low rank?

Originally posted by Speedster879:

Originally posted by Glued:

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

So rank 0 is the highest rank you have to be to be a low rank?

No, I think that ranks 20 and under are..

Originally posted by Glued:

Originally posted by Speedster879:

Originally posted by Glued:

In my opinion, I think 0 is a low rank.

So rank 0 is the highest rank you have to be to be a low rank?

No, I think that ranks 20 and under are..

As long as you’re not calling a rank 1 a pro.

So what im getting is most people think around ranks 20-30 or under is low. Some 15-20 and if rank 40 was a low rank… thats just ridiculous. if you thought rank 40 was a low rank then you must be like 50 >.> but… 40 to me does not fit the common sense of “low rank” :/ its just not right.

below 25