How many otters play civ 3

Tremble before Persia as my immortals will destroy all who oppose us!

just installed it few days ago out of nostalgia
it’s too simple

Originally posted by hisbrobeatshim:

just installed it few days ago out of nostalgia
it’s too simple

Try changing the difficulty and try a huge world on chieften. That gets hard as well.

I don’t play it. I have the game though.

Originally posted by Immortal7777:

Originally posted by hisbrobeatshim:

just installed it few days ago out of nostalgia
it’s too simple

Try changing the difficulty and try a huge world on chieften. That gets hard as well.

you mean, sid?

anyway, I didn’t say it is too easy. I said it is too simple. As in, not complicated enough. It can be hard but it still is pretty straightforward and repetitive.
still, I like the graphics

Even on chieften I have trouble with it if it’s a large world. My immortals rule ancient times and I can wipe out about 10 civs but then they get too big.

I played it for a good month or two.
Go Bismarck! Go Germany!

meh, They don’t get the special unit till modern times so I pick persia cause I can kill everybody immedietly. Immortals are like super swords men.

Never liked Civ III
Civ IV is better

No

I prefer Iroquious with their Mounted Warriors as they are faster than Immortals and can pillage your improvements and attack before your Immortals can do anything

Civillization III is too mainstream…
Civ IV for the wind!

Originally posted by denamo:

I prefer Iroquious with their Mounted Warriors as they are faster than Immortals and can pillage your improvements and attack before your Immortals can do anything

But they are nly advanced warriors so my immortals would defeat one cause they are swordsmen.

Originally posted by Immortal7777:

Originally posted by denamo:

I prefer Iroquious with their Mounted Warriors as they are faster than Immortals and can pillage your improvements and attack before your Immortals can do anything

But they are nly advanced warriors so my immortals would defeat one cause they are swordsmen.

Immortals only have 2 defense compared to Mounted Warriors’ 3 attack

Freeciv is better

Originally posted by denamo:

Originally posted by Immortal7777:

Originally posted by denamo:

I prefer Iroquious with their Mounted Warriors as they are faster than Immortals and can pillage your improvements and attack before your Immortals can do anything

But they are nly advanced warriors so my immortals would defeat one cause they are swordsmen.

Immortals only have 2 defense compared to Mounted Warriors’ 3 attack

But immortals have 4 attack

holy fuck kid don’t play civ as if it is your average rpg
it’s not just conquest, there are other ways to win, too!

I have the game, but not the expansion.

Otters don’t play games, silly.

Originally posted by hisbrobeatshim:

holy fuck kid don’t play civ as if it is your average rpg
it’s not just conquest, there are other ways to win, too!

NO I WILL KILL EVERYONE!

Originally posted by Immortal7777:

Originally posted by hisbrobeatshim:

holy fuck kid don’t play civ as if it is your average rpg
it’s not just conquest, there are other ways to win, too!

NO I WILL KILL EVERYONE!

kill yourself

Originally posted by Seesine:

Otters don’t play games, silly.

Holy shit it took this damn long to make the joke about otters =/= OTers?

Originally posted by hisbrobeatshim:

Originally posted by Immortal7777:

Originally posted by hisbrobeatshim:

holy fuck kid don’t play civ as if it is your average rpg
it’s not just conquest, there are other ways to win, too!

NO I WILL KILL EVERYONE!

kill yourself

I’ll kill you.