Sikesalicous
2846 posts
|
Would you rather have a president that you can trust 100% to be honest and straightforward, or a president with an incredible amount of experience in politics? Whether this president agrees with your political party is out of the question.
|
|
|
ThatsSoMFT
1105 posts
|
honesty doesn’t mean shit
|
|
|
Aldir
10108 posts
|
Originally posted by ThatsSoMFT:
honesty doesn’t mean shit
^This
I’d rather have someone that lies but makes the country rich and powerful that a retard who gives away every state secret.
|
|
|
Zachary_Greene
11307 posts
|
Assuming that the honest one wouldn’t get assassinated right away, him.
A dishonest bastard who is “good” in politics or has been in it for a long time will be no different than previous presidents in the USA. All it’d do is further the destruction that will be followed one day when things change.
The honest one is better over all, and there’s no real reason to pick the one you’re basically implying that’s a bastard.
There’s really no reason to pick the other one.
Originally posted by Aldir: I’d rather have someone that lies but makes the country rich and powerful that a retard who gives away every state secret.
A nation becoming rich and powerful is done in two ways.
Honestly, or by faking it.
The USA for example is Rich and Powerful, but why?
We made bullshit money without backing it up, then securing enough military to rape anything we didn’t like.
Once we had a military, we would just take what we want.
Eventually that fails because everyone begins to hate you, and someone will eventually rebel.
Fake money can turn into real power, however it will always collapse.
|
|
|
JoeySkywalker
3956 posts
|
I would take honesty. If someone says they will do something I would like them to do it
|
|
|
Ruudiluca
9170 posts
|
An honest president would be terrible.
If the president was honest, he would just come onto live TV and say “We’re all screwed”.
|
|
|
JoeySkywalker
3956 posts
|
Originally posted by Ruudiluca:
An honest president would be terrible.
If the president was honest, he would just come onto live TV and say “We’re all screwed”.
But we are all screwed. As adults we can handle the truth and work toward fixing it.
/perfect world that exists only in my mind
|
|
|
ThatsSoMFT
1105 posts
|
Originally posted by JoeySkywalker:
I would take honesty. If someone says they will do something I would like them to do it
If someone said he would dissolve the united states, would you like him to do it
|
|
|
JoeySkywalker
3956 posts
|
Originally posted by ThatsSoMFT:
Originally posted by JoeySkywalker:
I would take honesty. If someone says they will do something I would like them to do it
If someone said he would dissolve the united states, would you like him to do it
Well if he was running for president and that was what he said he would do then no, but I would rather know that ahead of time then have someone lie their way into office and do it anyway.
|
|
|
Zoronii
8056 posts
|
I don’t care if someone agrees with my political agenda or not. If they actually do something good for the country it’s all fine by me.
As long as they don’t censor the internet.
Then we’ll have a problem.
|
|
|
Rolby
5707 posts
|
lol honest is for losers. best presidents are presidents who do everything to make the country strong.
|
|
|
Hallucent
8690 posts
|
There are no honest politicians.
|
|
|
Darver
1369 posts
|
Originally posted by Zachary_Greene:
Assuming that the honest one wouldn’t get assassinated right away, him.
A dishonest bastard who is “good” in politics or has been in it for a long time will be no different than previous presidents in the USA. All it’d do is further the destruction that will be followed one day when things change.
The honest one is better over all, and there’s no real reason to pick the one you’re basically implying that’s a bastard.
There’s really no reason to pick the other one.
Originally posted by Aldir: I’d rather have someone that lies but makes the country rich and powerful that a retard who gives away every state secret.
A nation becoming rich and powerful is done in two ways.
Honestly, or by faking it.
The USA for example is Rich and Powerful, but why?
We made bullshit money without backing it up, then securing enough military to rape anything we didn’t like.
Once we had a military, we would just take what we want.
Eventually that fails because everyone begins to hate you, and someone will eventually rebel.
Fake money can turn into real power, however it will always collapse.
Basically I agree with everything he said.
I would write my own opinion properly, but typing is too much effort right now.
|
|
|
bobby71983
4930 posts
|
People experienced in politics should not be politicians. Experience means nothing if you are being deceitful.
This choice is easy. Being trustworthy is hard to rival.
|
|
|
Rich112
12645 posts
|
|
|
|
SpearDudezor
21881 posts
|
If he has experience, he could use it in any direction. If he’s honest, I’ll know what his intentions are. Experience doesn’t mean that much. I’d rather have an able, clever, intelligent president than an experienced one.
So I’m going with honest. If by “honest” you also mean with good intentions, then I definitely pick honest. I don’t even care how able he/she is in that case.
|
|
|
Freezerburnt
7429 posts
|
I’d have an honest president, the people in Congress have been around forever and they don’t accomplish anything.
|
|
|
VoodooCoffeeGuy
1913 posts
|
Yes totally Originally posted by ThatsSoMFT:
Originally posted by JoeySkywalker:
I would take honesty. If someone says they will do something I would like them to do it
If someone said he would dissolve the united states, would you like him to do it
|
|
|
Timothynot
220 posts
|
|