What does this mean for me? You will always be able to play your favorite games on Kongregate. However, certain site features may suddenly stop working and leave you with a severely degraded experience.
What should I do? We strongly urge all our users to upgrade to modern browsers for a better experience and improved security.
We suggest you install the latest version of one of these browsers:
Kongregate is a community-driven browser games portal with an open platform for all web games.
Get your games in front of thousands of users while monetizing through ads and virtual goods.
Learn more »
this is the best answer to me;
first we assume that 1/0 has an answer.
we now write down 1/0 = X
in that case X \* 0 = 1 .
because a number \* 0 = 0, X has no answer.
now there are people who state that the answer is infinity.
this is not true.
we take an infinite row of 0s
if they should add up with a number \> 0, at least one (probably more) of the infinite row of 0s should be \> 0
however, if that is the case, that number does not belong in the row of 0s because when X \> 0, X =! 0
so we kick that numbers out of our infinite row of perfect 0s.
because 0+0 = 0
and we can repeat this infinite times.
1/0 != infinity.
we now can safely conclude that 1/0 has no answer.
the same thing applies for every number that =! 0
for 0/0 the answer is a lot easier
if 0/0 = A
A \* 0 = 0
Because every number multiplied by 0 becomes 0
A can be every number, being both real, imaginary, long, short or infinite.
> *Originally posted by **[CrystalShadow](/forums/2/topics/44500?page=2#posts-969315):***
> Actually, this equation DOES equal a paradox. As shown by a real life example.
> I have 10 cookies. I want to divide the 10 cookies among my friends and myself. However, let’s remove those friends so that I’ve reduced the denominator closer to zero. I still have myself, which is 10/1. The only way to get to zero is to remove myself. 10/0. Now, if there are no receivers for the cookies to be divided among, then originally, no one possessed the cookies. The cookies may still exist, but they can be divided unto nothing, as nothing is there to distribute them. Therefore the amount of cookies is zero. Now our equation is X=0/0. Basic proportions indicate that 0/0 = 2/2 = 17/17, and so on. What’s any number divided by itself? One. But, if 0/0 =1, how so? If there are no cookies, and no one to claim them, how can the result be that each person gets a single cookie? They don’t materialize from thin air. Thus, this equation is nonexistent. However, if the equation is nonexistent, then this data has never been shown, which means that there’s still room for scientists to search the mystery of dividing by zero. Researching this can lead to the exact same result, and the loop is continuous. Paradox.
> Now you people may proceed to discover loopholes and/or errors in my argument that I failed to notice.
I still want someone to try to find errors and/or loopholes because I’m sure this can’t be right, but I’m not sure how.
Well, you’ve assumed that because x/x = 1 (for x != 0), then 0/0 = 1 too. This is not true. Can we not say by the same logic that because 0/x = 0 (for x != 0), then 0/0 = 0?
Clearly 0/0 cannot take two different values, simultaneously. Hence, it is undefined.
(If we take limits as well as equalites, it can also be argued that 0/0 = infinity and also -infinity too.)
> *Originally posted by **[CrystalShadow](/forums/2/topics/44500?page=3#posts-970263):***
> I never said that 0/0 actually equals 1, I just said that by basic logic, it should.
But by basic logic, it should also equal 0 ;-]