What does this mean for me? You will always be able to play your favorite games on Kongregate. However, certain site features may suddenly stop working and leave you with a severely degraded experience.
What should I do? We strongly urge all our users to upgrade to modern browsers for a better experience and improved security.
We suggest you install the latest version of one of these browsers:
Kongregate is a community-driven browser games portal with an open platform for all web games.
Get your games in front of thousands of users while monetizing through ads and virtual goods.
Learn more »
Here we will discuss which of 2 card who has nearly the ability is better here are some starting topics :
1)Shard of Divinity or Stone Skin
2)Lava Golem or Forest Spirit
3)Blue Crawler or Horned Frog
4)Azure Dragon or Ice Dragon
and 5) Vampire Stiletto or Druitic Staff
So post ,post and post by your statistics about the cards.
(It would be good if you did 1 discussion at a time or else you would get lots of cross discussions and add the card images so people can know the card statistics and not make a mistake thinking it was something else. You can use wiki and right click for card image link then add “!” on its sides here.)
Guess since the OP and MansW1 suggested it, It should be first:
!(http://elementscommunity.org/images/Cards/HornedFrog.png) VS !(http://elementscommunity.org/images/Cards/BlueCrawler.png)
Horned Frog wins because it’s cheaper to play and allows you to end up with more quantum. Question you guys did suggest it’s un-upped names but are are only judging for un-upped only or upgraded as well?
> *Originally posted by **[MansW1](/forums/22/topics/331932?page=1#posts-6959887):***
> vs flesh spider vs gravition mercanery
!(http://elementscommunity.org/images/Cards/FleshSpider.png) VS !(http://elementscommunity.org/images/Cards/GravitonMercenary.png)
I would go with Mercenary if it was based on stats to resist CC better but Flesh Spider is more acceptable in duos. What do you think Mans1?
i think this forum is good so i will add a status for each of the cards. And Qazz you can compare upgraded and non upgraded also for example Cryssahorah v/s phylaselphia .The cards with more points lose.the Status should be like this:
Name:(0 points )
Element and cost:1-3(1pt) 4-6(2pts) 6-10(3pts)above 10 (4pts)
How much used it is: Little ( 5pts ) average use (3pts) mostly used (2pt)
Rarity : common (1pt) rare (3pts) ultra rare ( 5pts )
Dependence on spell or skill in a deck : not necessary (2pts) Very much needed (4pts)
Affected by which shield: 1-7 (3pts) 8-13 ( 5pts) 14 – 20 ( 6 pts ) 20 – 26 ( 7pts ) 26-34 ( 8pts)[also counting upgraded form]
Total points :
then we compare
Heres the balance formula for reference: Cost = Atk + [floor] def/5 [/floor] + ability value – 1
Of course some cards are UP (crawler) some are OP (crismon) and some need a REAL REBALANCE (Golden nymph). And you said rarity is not a balance factor. Zanz I am dissapoint.