TheIdiocyWizard
2759 posts
|
Yes, that quote is from Einstein.
|
|
|
Christon555
929 posts
|
Again, wasn’t there supposed to be an update?
|
|
|
Jimbo14
5346 posts
|
Again, it saved me because I didn’t send in my action last night because I was otherwise engaged.
|
|
|
Pokarnor
17361 posts
|
Why is HappyYay getting late on the updates?
I wanted to read the update this morning.
|
|
|
HappyYay
8573 posts
|
Hello. So far I haven’t read the thread or any of my PMs, but the reason there has been no update (or response to any PMs) is because before I woke up yesterday, my internet inexplicably died. It just got fixed now, and the update will be tonight.
|
|
|
HappyYay
8573 posts
|
Hey Idiocy, I am trying to respond to one of your PMs, but can’t. It says “Recipient is not accepting your communications” which I think means you muted me. Do you know why this is happening?
|
|
|
Firespread
7170 posts
|
Obviously, he muted you.
Or your kong is fucked up.
|
|
|
HappyYay
8573 posts
|
Update is here! Maps are in the OP, as always.
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Chile no longer recognizes the People’s Republic of China as a legitimate government, but rather regards them as an army of usurping communists occupying mainland China. Instead, Chile recognizes the legitimate Republic of China operating primarily in Taiwan as being sovereign over all of China.
The rebellious communists shall be defeated and the legitimate government restored as soon as possible, if the Chilean Army has its way. That will be all.
|
|
|
TheIdiocyWizard
2759 posts
|
Well actually, we are no longer communist. A while ago in the game China became a democratic nation with a style of government similar to that of the United States.
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Ah. Well then, we retract our unfair accusations of communism, since clearly you have reformed your rebels under a more noble set of beliefs.
However, Chile still chooses to recognize the Republic of China, in Taiwan, rather than the rebels currently occupying the Chinese mainland.
|
|
|
Christon555
929 posts
|
Originally posted by W0LVERINE123:
Chile no longer recognizes the People’s Republic of China as a legitimate government, but rather regards them as an army of usurping communists occupying mainland China. Instead, Chile recognizes the legitimate Republic of China operating primarily in Taiwan as being sovereign over all of China.
The rebellious communists shall be defeated and the legitimate government restored as soon as possible, if the Chilean Army has its way. That will be all.
Ok. Quick question, though; How does that make any goddamn sense?
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Originally posted by Christon555:
Originally posted by W0LVERINE123:
Chile no longer recognizes the People’s Republic of China as a legitimate government, but rather regards them as an army of usurping communists occupying mainland China. Instead, Chile recognizes the legitimate Republic of China operating primarily in Taiwan as being sovereign over all of China.
The rebellious communists shall be defeated and the legitimate government restored as soon as possible, if the Chilean Army has its way. That will be all.
Ok. Quick question, though; How does that make any goddamn sense?
Chile has simply cut off relations with the People’s Republic of China, and opened relations with the Republic of China. For a long time the USA had been doing the same, until… the 1970s, I think? But anyhow, it’s not difficult to comprehend, although clearly you are blinded by rage at your lack of significant achievements in the war, so I will assume you were simply not thinking clearly when you asked that question.
Also, such hostile language will get you nowhere. Chile considers the UNA a domestic threat now that it has evidently attacked Mexico, a clear violation of our earlier agreement not to wage war in the Americas. Now that you have threatened ALAN directly, Chile also vows to defend Mexico if it should be attacked, and we will no longer restrict ourselves to proxy warfare.
|
|
|
TheIdiocyWizard
2759 posts
|
It is obvious that either Chile or UFoW tried frame the UNA. I’m leaning more towards Chile but I have no proof yet. As for Taiwan, I do not really care if you consider it the sovereign nation of China, since the Chinese people seem to be quite happy under my leader ship.
|
|
|
Pokarnor
17361 posts
|
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Originally posted by TheIdiocyWizard:
It is obvious that either Chile or UFoW tried frame the UNA. I’m leaning more towards Chile but I have no proof yet. As for Taiwan, I do not really care if you consider it the sovereign nation of China, since the Chinese people seem to be quite happy under my leader ship.
Russia has little control over its own funds, the Ursine Aegis has barely enough funds to defend itself, and Chile has been spending so much on the war effort that it was unable to afford even the ALAN tax last quarter. I see no room to fake any attacks.
Having been so quick to try and pass off the blame onto clearly innocent parties, perhaps the Chinese rebels of the IDC paid for the attack to be carried out by their allies in the UNA to try and alienate Chile from its closest allies.
Originally posted by Pokarnor:
You lead from a ship?
And clearly it is a ship that he forces his people to live in the cargo hold of, as indicated by the Chinese people being “under” it. Alternately he could be mowing down his own fishermen, but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt.
|
|
|
Jimbo14
5346 posts
|
I say that this war remains as a proxy war, I wish not for all of ALAN or all of MCOW to get dragged in.
|
|
|
Jimbo14
5346 posts
|
I propose that Sudan, and any other west African nation, as well as any middle eastern nation, if they would be willing to join into the Modern Coalition of the Old World, and possibly even cede to Saudi Arabia, at which point the name may be subject to change. If any nation has a problem with M-COW I would be more than willing to sort out the issues.
I have a specific proposal to Somalia, stating that if the official government, what’s left of it, officially cedes to Saudi Arabia, it may finally end the warlord violence, and pirating, bring forth economical prosperity, and leave allow the people to be happy, something they haven’t been able to do. They live in fear and starvation, we wish to change this.
|
|
|
HappyYay
8573 posts
|
Originally posted by Jimbo14:
I propose that Sudan, and any other west African nation, as well as any middle eastern nation, if they would be willing to join into the Modern Coalition of the Old World, and possibly even cede to Saudi Arabia, at which point the name may be subject to change. If any nation has a problem with M-COW I would be more than willing to sort out the issues.
I have a specific proposal to Somalia, stating that if the official government, what’s left of it, officially cedes to Saudi Arabia, it may finally end the warlord violence, and pirating, bring forth economical prosperity, and leave allow the people to be happy, something they haven’t been able to do. They live in fear and starvation, we wish to change this.
Sudan, South Sudan, and Chad will join M-COW.
Somalia declines.
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Originally posted by Jimbo14:
I say that this war remains as a proxy war, I wish not for all of ALAN or all of MCOW to get dragged in.
It’s too late. ALAN soil has already been assaulted. M-COW, on the other hand, remains unaffected; it has already denounced Saudi Arabia’s actions, and quite frankly, I am surprised that it is still allowing you to conduct its diplomatic affairs.
If Saudi Arabia really wished to keep M-COW neutral, it would cede its territorial holdings in Siberia to the Ursine Aegis and withdraw from the war.
|
|
|
Christon555
929 posts
|
Originally posted by W0LVERINE123:
The Ursine Alliance intends to achieve victory not through brute force but through careful, well thought-out strategy and impeccable execution of joint operations. There will be no hope of victory for the Kyoto Alliance; our meticulous grand strategy leaves no room for such frivolities as defeat, and our allies are at least as resolute as those of the United States.
Again, Chile demands the unconditional surrender of the Kyoto Alliance. Failure to capitulate now will result in even harsher terms being laid out upon our victory. The Ursine Alliance will not accept the surrender of individual nations; only the full, unconditional surrender of the Kyoto Alliance will sate us now that we have been wronged so grievously.
Heh. I just read this on the previous page. How’d that meticulous grand strategy work out for you, Chile?
|
|
|
Firespread
7170 posts
|
Originally posted by Christon555:
Originally posted by W0LVERINE123:
The Ursine Alliance intends to achieve victory not through brute force but through careful, well thought-out strategy and impeccable execution of joint operations. There will be no hope of victory for the Kyoto Alliance; our meticulous grand strategy leaves no room for such frivolities as defeat, and our allies are at least as resolute as those of the United States.
Again, Chile demands the unconditional surrender of the Kyoto Alliance. Failure to capitulate now will result in even harsher terms being laid out upon our victory. The Ursine Alliance will not accept the surrender of individual nations; only the full, unconditional surrender of the Kyoto Alliance will sate us now that we have been wronged so grievously.
Heh. I just read this on the previous page. How’d that meticulous grand strategy work out for you, Chile?
Was fucked up when that goddamn oil was taken so easily.
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Originally posted by Christon555:
Originally posted by W0LVERINE123:
The Ursine Alliance intends to achieve victory not through brute force but through careful, well thought-out strategy and impeccable execution of joint operations. There will be no hope of victory for the Kyoto Alliance; our meticulous grand strategy leaves no room for such frivolities as defeat, and our allies are at least as resolute as those of the United States.
Again, Chile demands the unconditional surrender of the Kyoto Alliance. Failure to capitulate now will result in even harsher terms being laid out upon our victory. The Ursine Alliance will not accept the surrender of individual nations; only the full, unconditional surrender of the Kyoto Alliance will sate us now that we have been wronged so grievously.
Heh. I just read this on the previous page. How’d that meticulous grand strategy work out for you, Chile?
I don’t think you understand what a “grand strategy” is.
Anyhow, as you do not know any details of the Ursine Alliance’s grand strategy, attempting to comment on its apparent failures merely weakens your intellectual position. Would you like to know, my dear Christon, how our grand strategy has worked out? Ask again once we have won the war, and I will tell you exactly what went right, and what went wrong.
|
|
|
Christon555
929 posts
|
Here, I’ll tell you the Kyoto Alliances strategy;
KICKING ASS.
Seriously, it took two days of debate to work that out. Some anonymous members, Korea, thought we should add, “AND TAKING NAMES,” but the rest of us thought it would be too expensive and overextend our forces.
|
|
|
W0LVERINE123
987 posts
|
Originally posted by Christon555:
Here, I’ll tell you the Kyoto Alliances strategy;
KICKING ASS.
Seriously, it took two days of debate to work that out. Some anonymous members, Korea, thought we should add, “AND TAKING NAMES,” but the rest of us thought it would be too expensive and overextend our forces.
Oh, brilliant. I’m surprised that the sheer intellectual power that the Kyoto Alliance had to exert in order to come up with that strategy hasn’t short-circuited my laptop.
|