mcginn12360
46 posts
|
Who Will Win the Super Bowl.
Post Who You Think Will Win.
Who Are In The Playoffs Right Now.
|
|
|
tenco1
13690 posts
|
|
|
|
Jantonaitis
3252 posts
|
|
|
|
mcginn12360
46 posts
|
Originally posted by Jantonaitis:
what’s a super bowl?
Football
Superbowl
Watch it On TV
|
|
|
mcginn12360
46 posts
|
Who Wants Raven To Win And Who Wants 49ers To Win
|
|
|
beauval
1181 posts
|
I thought somebody wanted to talk about soup.
|
|
|
JaumeBG
10515 posts
|
I had a super bowl of Cheerios this morning. Fuck me, they’re good. So this morning I definitely won the super bowl.
|
|
|
vikaTae
11748 posts
|
considering the ‘superbowl’ is not broadcast outside of America, and uses a version of football, that isn’t the same thing as what everyone else on the planet knows as football, I doubt you will find many who care, either way.
Personally, it is sport, and sport is the one thing guaranteed to work if I cannot get to sleep any other way. Unless the teams are playing it naked, you’re not going to arrouse my interest.
|
|
|
rwbstripes
178 posts
|
Originally posted by vikaTae:
considering the ‘superbowl’ is not broadcast outside of America, and uses a version of football, that isn’t the same thing as what everyone else on the planet knows as football, I doubt you will find many who care, either way.
Personally, it is sport, and sport is the one thing guaranteed to work if I cannot get to sleep any other way. Unless the teams are playing it naked, you’re not going to arrouse my interest.
Do you tune in to watch the lingerie games to get a chance at seeing nudity?
|
|
|
NeilSenna
1924 posts
|
Originally posted by vikaTae:
considering the ‘superbowl’ is not broadcast outside of America, and uses a version of football, that isn’t the same thing as what everyone else on the planet knows as football, I doubt you will find many who care, either way.
It’s broadcast elsewhere (is in the UK anyway, graveyard slot on one of the BBC channels) but only three people care, and two of them can’t stay up until 4am/whenever it finished.
Originally posted by rwbstripes:
Do you tune in to watch the lingerie games to get a chance at seeing nudity?
Sadly that (the only bit of a Superbowl program that could generate a scrap of interest) isn’t shown here.
|
|
|
vikaTae
11748 posts
|
Do you tune in to watch the lingerie games to get a chance at seeing nudity?
If it is broadcast on the net, and if it involves the players themselves in their undershorts or less (preferrably less) running around and getting all hot and sweaty then I’m interested. If it is, PM the stream url please.
|
|
|
JaumeBG
10515 posts
|
A quick Google search will do the trick for you.
|
|
|
rwbstripes
178 posts
|
Originally posted by vikaTae:
Do you tune in to watch the lingerie games to get a chance at seeing nudity?
If it is broadcast on the net, and if it involves the players themselves in their undershorts or less (preferrably less) running around and getting all hot and sweaty then I’m interested. If it is, PM the stream url please.
Didn’t know you swung that way, Vika.
http://www.lflus.com/
|
|
|
tenco1
13690 posts
|
Originally posted by rwbstripes:
Didn’t know you swung that way, Vika.
http://www.lflus.com/
Yeah, I don’t think many of us are actually all that clear on her sexuality.
|
|
|
beauval
1181 posts
|
Vika, I think this may be what you’re looking for.
|
|
|
Kwadwo195
121 posts
|
|
|
|
vikaTae
11748 posts
|
Originally posted by tenco1:
Yeah, I don’t think many of us are actually all that clear on her sexuality.
Heterosexual. Well, mostly. Also willing to experiment quite a bit. But when it comes to watching, hot, sweaty, well muscled males in their birthday suits are fine. If only they would play the matches in the nude, they’d have my undivided attention.
Originally posted by rwbstripes:
Didn’t know you swung that way, Vika.
http://www.lflus.com/
That link’s for female players. Not erotic in the least. I was asking for male players specifically. Ideally well hung, well muscled men with it all hanging out. Preferably drenched in sweat with artistically ripped clothing.
Basically very similar to what the old mag Playgirl used to put out. Though I’m willing to go with less rose petals, and if necessary, less authentic tans.
Originally posted by beauval:
Vika, I think this may be what you’re looking for.
No, those are sumo wrestlers. Mountains of fat do nothing for me. Neither do their nappies. The body has to be toned to quite a fair degree.
All I’m asking for here is a little gender equality – if they do female scantilly clad events, then surely they must do male ones as well. Different strokes for different folks. Early morning broadcast doesn’t bother me. The TV card has a record function after all, and its not as if I’m short on hard drive space.
|
|
|
JaumeBG
10515 posts
|
It’s no so much about gender equality as it is about revenue. Men, as you may know, are (or can become) horny 99% of the time, as opposed to women, who aren’t as much. Having such a show aimed mainly for heterosexual women may not bring in as much revenue to TV companies; and of course, that is not of interest for them to pursue.
|
|
|
vikaTae
11748 posts
|
Originally posted by JaumeBG:
Men, as you may know, are (or can become) horny 99% of the time, as opposed to women, who aren’t as much.
Depends what’s on offer. We’re just less visually obvious about it. But, you’d think they’d at least have some team nekkid events broadcast via the net.
|
|
|
karmakoolkid
5419 posts
|
Originally posted by vikaTae:
All I’m asking for here is a little gender equality – if they do female scantilly clad events, then surely they must do male ones as well. Different strokes for different folks.
I hear ya.
Women who will be slidding across that floor on bare thighs….quite often.
Men who will be ON THE FLOOR (w/ anything other than foot) a lot less often.
Men back-when
AND, I can tell ya that the men of today are much more muscled and even better bods than “back then”.
SO, why do we still insist on women showing next to all,,,
and men looking like total slobs….eh?
It’s not like MOST women are really interested in…….OR, ARE THEY? LOL
|
|
|
EPR89
9033 posts
|
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by vikaTae:
All I’m asking for here is a little gender equality – if they do female scantilly clad events, then surely they must do male ones as well. Different strokes for different folks.
I hear ya.
Women who will be slidding across that floor on bare thighs….quite often.
Men who will be ON THE FLOOR (w/ anything other than foot) a lot less often.
Men back-when
AND, I can tell ya that the men of today are much more muscled and even better bods than “back then”.
SO, why do we still insist on women showing next to all,,,
and men looking like total slobs….eh?
It’s not like MOST women are really interested in…….OR, ARE THEY? LOL
You know what’s funny?
Especially the “tough” sports hat are immensely popular where they are practised are still very female viewer friendly.
Wrestling:

Rugby:

(although most pro rugby players are probably simply so massive that normal shorts look like volleyball shorts on them)
Australian rules football:

Sumo:

(tastes differ)
Muay Thai:

Actually, just yesterday I was approached by someone who quite liked my Muay Thai shorts during training. Her exact words were these: “Your punches are wicked! And your shorts are nice. Especially from behind.”
I felt so objectified… Oh, and I quite liked it. XD
|