What And How Will Co2 Change Are Futures

Ok i dont really know the current theory …. but using my common sense this is what i think will happen ……

First co2 will cause the earth’s temperature to raise …..
Ice caps melt causing the earth’s temperature to lower ……
Plants die so Co2 wont go away ……. making the temperature slowly go up ……
Then we will go back to normal if plants survive cause they will slowly take away co2 …. but if no plants survive the earth will end up barren ……
Im probley talking bulls ….. but this is just simple observations :/
What do you thinks going to happen ?

I think that is a gross oversimplification that is wrong on many fronts.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html
Scientists can’t explain why world is getting colder.

Also I don’t think ice caps melting would cause earth’s temperature to lower. There is no such thing as cold, just absence of heat. Thus, if earth is actually getting colder, then heat would only be escaping from it.

It isn’t getting colder, nor does your source claim it is.

Originally posted by SaintAjora:

It isn’t getting colder, nor does your source claim it is.

Well.. yea I think it said it is on a hold or something.

Originally posted by Thatsomegoodname:

Originally posted by SaintAjora:

It isn’t getting colder, nor does your source claim it is.

Well.. yea I think it said it is on a hold or something.

Which is not the same as it getting colder.

As for the actual topic, there’s very little way of knowing until we actually get there. The climate will change, and that’s as detailed as I can get.

Which explains why the policies they suggest often hurt greedy businesses. Profit indeed.

It is part of their ‘green’ plan, they want to control how people live.

Which is different than profit. You get your lies and nonsense easily confused I see.

They are clearly being paid off to make it seem like they are hurting businesses.

Only there is absolutely no proof of that anywhere.

You just don’t get it

I never was good at getting into the mind of a raving madman. Looks like I need to hit the books again.

CO2 is the core of our Global Warming troubles, at least as far as I have gathered from everything I have read on the subject. There are other ways to address these troubles, sure, but the only permanent solution lies with eliminating the problem.

dont forget methane is a major greenhouse gas and plays a significant role in global warming/climate change.

I heard the growing population is adding to much of this CO2…..
One unethical solution is to curb population growth….. This is real……. I’m beginning to worry for my 3 lovely daughters

I heard the growing population is adding to much of this CO2…..

Cars emit CO2, not people.

Using population control to solve increasing CO2 emissions would be like solving a flu by cutting of your head.

arn’t cows a bigger polluter compared to cars?

Originally posted by generalvalter:

I heard the growing population is adding to much of this CO2…..

Cars emit CO2, not people.

Using population control to solve increasing CO2 emissions would be like solving a flu by cutting of your head.

You are not looking at the bigger picture…. we breath, we waste, we drive, we eat and yes… we fart

You are not looking at the bigger picture

And you somehow are?

Worrying about human flatulence when there are a vast majority of other things with far more significant impacts on the environment?

And assuming that randomly killing off people is what some government is going to decide to do?

arn’t cows a bigger polluter compared to cars?

Apparently so.

Of course, this is still a man-made (and man-solved) problem, probably caused by the increase in beef demands.

Originally posted by Jabor:

You are not looking at the bigger picture

And you somehow are?

Worrying about human flatulence when there are a vast majority of other things with far more significant impacts on the environment?

And assuming that randomly killing off people is what some government is going to decide to do?

Really unlike you to miss an apparent point. We are the ones that create the situation we are in.
I call strawman on your 2nd question. I said curb growth…. not killing

Of course, this is still a man-made (and man-solved) problem, probably caused by the increase in beef demands.

Its not solved yet….

I said curb…. not killing

This is real……. I’m beginning to worry for my 3 lovely daughters

Unless you’re worrying that your “3 lovely daughters” won’t be able to have as many children of their own?

Originally posted by Jabor:

I said curb…. not killing

This is real……. I’m beginning to worry for my 3 lovely daughters

Unless you’re worrying that your “3 lovely daughters” won’t be able to have as many children of their own?

And many more….

Cow overpopulation is a problem we are responsible for. Cow overpopulation is a problem we can solve, with relative simplicity.

So I should smack every vegetarian for not eating cows and burn down every Chick fil’A in the city?

Saying cows are more problematic than cars seems.. a little bit irrelevant? (we are all contributing to this bullshit problem).

well, it is important, actually. Stemming the cow population, one way or another, would give a much more immediate and beneficial result than working on car emissions.

….with relative simplicity.

I don’t believe it can be solved easily. Proof, if you can, otherwise

I would like to mention that “relative” means “in relation to something else”. In this case, reducing cow population would be much easier, in relation to reducing car emissions, which is much more difficult.

I’ll answer the question anyway, though. By changing gears to another type of food. If cows cause the most significant trouble to the environment, it would be more environmentally friendly to focus more on chickens instead.

Ah … I see. Its not easy to change peoples’ taste or appetite, not to say the greed of corporations. Just my opinion…. lazy to pull out proof to truth.